<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
Equal rights, and justice! And a first step toward more to come. <br>
<br>
From the USSC ruling:<br>
<br>
--- quotes ---<br>
<br>
Held: <br>
<br>
1. This Court has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the case...<br>
<br>
2. DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of
persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment...<br>
<br>
(a) By history and tradition the definition and regulation of
marriage has been treated as being within the authority and realm of
the separate States...<br>
<br>
(b) By seeking to injure the very class New York seeks to protect,
DOMA violates basic due process and equal protection principles
applicable to the Federal Government...<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_g2bh.pdf">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_g2bh.pdf</a><br>
<br>
--- end quotes ---<br>
<br>
<br>
Very interesting: "protected class" language.<br>
<br>
What I find particularly interesting is that this ruling frequently
refers to "the class New York seeks to protect" and similar
language. <br>
<br>
The term "protected class," has specific meanings and implications
in civil rights law: it refers to a group of persons whose rights
are specifically protected by anti-discrimination laws. <br>
<br>
For example any racial/ethnic minority that has been subjected to
discrimination or deliberate disadvantage under the law or public
policy, or by threats and coercion having substantially the same
effect of denying rights under law (such as by KKK intimidation of
black voters). Women are a protected class via laws and court
rulings about gender discrimination. Persons with disabilities are
a protected class via the ADA and court rulings. <br>
<br>
Federal law recognizes race, religion, gender, age, and disability
as protected classes. State laws in some states extend protected
class status to gay, bi, lesbian, and (more rarely) transgender
persons. <br>
<br>
The Court's ruling did not establish LGBT persons as a federal
protected class. However what it did, was acknowledge that certain
states, New York by name and others by logical inclusion, have
established LGBT persons as a protected class. <br>
<br>
In my (non-lawyer, layperson's) opinion, this wording is important
because: <br>
<br>
a) it recognizes the right of states to establish protected class
status for LGBT persons, and, <br>
<br>
b) in doing so, it sets out the first step on a trail that can be
used to establish protected class status for LGBT persons on a
federal basis, nationwide. <br>
<br>
----<br>
<br>
I gotta' scoot off to a work appointment, be back later. I've got a
work-stack with deadlines, so I might or might not make it to SR
tonight. Laters....<br>
<br>
-G.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13-06-26-Wed 8:28 AM, Romy Ilano
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFqWQB8ukSV7S2g9E1JVbgTtCEAT9RA_QsQqjJPVuqRtfqs6zg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">man, that is so awesome! =D</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org">sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss">http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>