<div dir="ltr">I object that <a href="https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association/Ban#Section_3.2_Conflict_Resolution">sub-section 3.2</a> Conflict Resolution has not been followed in the least. <div><br></div><div>If it had been followed, then there would have been a facilitator chosen <i><u>before the meeting where a decision is made about my access</u></i>. This is plainly indicated by <a href="https://sudoroom.org/wiki/File:SudoRoom.png">this graphic on the wiki</a> and the text of that section. </div><div><br></div><div>Had this been followed, I would have been notified of conflict before judgement, and I would not have been subjected to treatment I received tonight by the law abiding members of sudoroom. I should have been notified by the facilitator as to the fact that I was involved in a conflict before judgement. That did not happen.</div><div><br></div>As stated in the same section 3.2.1 of sudo's own articles, conflict resolution should proceed in "the spirit of a collaborative environment" (ibid), and that the conflict, whatever it is, should be sought to a <u>restorative</u> and not <u>retributive</u> end (sub-section 3.2.1). <div><br></div><div>Furthermore, my presumed innocence (3.2.1) and respect for privacy and dignity (3.2.1) has been grossly violated by whatever process was followed last week at the sudo meeting, not to mention previous gossip that precipitated call to action and judgement without process. </div><div><br></div><div>A vote for consent is not process.</div><div><br></div><div>In short, the entire process was hijacked by an accusation and nobody in the system did anything to see that due process was served. The same process yall have worked so hard to codify to maintain a happy space. Only now that I have been "served" does anybody point to the code of laws and say what must follow.</div><div><br></div><div>In fact that same code does claim that I have rights within this supposed system, if I can even be said to be allowed to suppose section 3.2 is followed. Contrast this to a previous email in this thread stating I have "no rights". Well, do I, or do I not? </div><div><br></div><div>Sub-section 3.2.1 states I have "right to an appeal and a fair process"; clearly a fair process has not been followed, and it's a "right"...</div><div><br></div><div>if people are to take this process seriously, then this "case" needs to be tossed on account of "mistrial". </div><div><br></div><div>I'm perfectly willing to undergo a process if it attempts to live up to the code of conflict resolution.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Marc Juul <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:juul@labitat.dk" target="_blank">juul@labitat.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Jake <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jake@spaz.org" target="_blank">jake@spaz.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">To do otherwise discredits our important conflict resolution process and disregards the basic rights of the accused. <br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Reminder: This is not a trial and we have no concept of "rights of the accused". It is bad that Johnny was not told that he was banned. The conflict resolution process is only available if a willing mediator and conflict steward is available and is only likely to resolve the conflict if both parties are willing to engage in mediation. <br><br></div><div>Johnny should be aware that he is also banned from Noisebridge per our cross-safe-space-ban policy.<br><br></div><div>The safe spaces mailing list has been notified.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br>-- <br></div><div>marc/juul<br></div></font></span></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
sudo-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org">sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org</a><br>
<a href="https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>