what SHOULD happen in a normal forwarding situation (per RFC 1191)When a packet arrives at a node from a client with too large an mtu,Hello mesh-dev.
I think we may finally have an explanation of the vexing issue of "I can't
connect to the internet over peoplesopen.net."
Marc and I spent some time staring at wireshark dumps and thinking
about why some clients are unable to consistently connect via the
tunnel last night. I think Marc came up with a disappointing but correct
answer: it is basically an mtu issue (mtu is not being discovered
correctly), BUT there is no good fix because we are tunneling at layer 2.
is that the node issue a ICMP "Destination Unreachable" packet with a "Fragmentation required" code. The client then uses this information to
reset its mtu.
This doesn't happen because we aren't really forwarding (forwarding happens
at layer 3). Instead, our interfaces (open0 and bat0) are bridged. So if a frame
coming from open0 doesn't fit into bat0 it most likely gets silently dropped.
So bridging open0 with bat0 is a disaster. A quick fix might be to replace
bridging with forwarding (at the IP level). I suspect this is not the right thing
to do. It might be better to abandon the idea of meshing at layer 2; there
are numerous advantages to this.
In any case; we should discuss options this Tuesday.
Alex
_______________________________________________ mesh-dev mailing list mesh-dev@lists.sudoroom.org https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/mesh-dev