> I second jorrit on using the old entity, as long as it our lawyer gives us
> the OK. It seems like the easier option. And our bylaws need a rewrite
> anyway, maybe this would be a good reason to give them a once over?
> -grant
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jorrit Poelen <
jhpoelen@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > I'd be for recycling the old entity if the paperwork is not too crazy and
> > that the mission is tailored to what sudomesh does.
> > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:34 -0700, Jenny Ryan wrote:
> > Should we:
> > 1) take over omni's old 501c3? -or-
> > 2) submit our own application for 501c3 status?
> >
> > *1) - take over omni's old 501c3?*
> > (a) It doesn't have a purpose at the moment, and we worked hella hard on
> > procuring it. was a long-form application, so has already been rigorously
> > reviewed by the irs.