Oops, yea not link local, but random. How do client devices get ipv4 addresses now? Not dhcp, right?

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Mitar <mitar@tnode.com> wrote:
Hi!

Ah, for nodes. Yes, nodes could have automatic IPv6 addresses (and not
even link-local, but global).

For clients is trickier.

But we could do some automatic IPv6 address subnets for nodes. :-)


Mitar

> Well, I'm not an expert on all the details, but I imagine we'd generate
> them randomly during makenode (or whenever). Then routes to addresses would
> be propagated by babel in the same way that ipv4 addresses are now. I'm not
> sure if the exit server would need an ipv6 address or if it would be good
> to switch existing nodes over.
>
> -Jehan
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Mitar <mitar@tnode.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I was asking for the "IPv6 randomly generated link-local
>> addresses" idea. How would that route?
>>
>>
>> Mitar
>>
>>>> And how would you route that over L3 network?
>>>
>>> Off the top of my head:
>>>
>>> - Packet headed somewhere on the internet with an ipv4 address comes
>> from a
>>> client device to the home node.
>>> - Home node pops that packet into an ipv6 packet bearing the ipv6 address
>>> of the exit server which is then routed over the mesh network
>>> - Exit server takes the ipv4 packet out and does NAT on it (switches the
>>> source address to public IP) and sends it out to the internet.
>>> - Response from internet comes back to exit server, the exit server does
>>> NAT again (switches the destination address to private IP)
>>> - Exit server puts the packet into an ipv6 packet with the ipv6 address
>> of
>>> the home node and sends it onto the mesh (it needs to have kept track of
>>> the ipv6 address)
>>> - Home node receives the ipv6 packet, takes the ipv4 packet out and sends
>>> it to the client.
>>>
>>> I'm not an expert, so there might be some issues with this. Here's an RFC
>>> which might be similar:
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7040
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Marc Juul <juul@labitat.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Mitar <mitar@tnode.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, we should put everything on ipv6 randomly generated link-local
>>>>>> addresses to avoid the whole makenode centralized IP assignment
>>>>> business.
>>>>>
>>>>> And how would you route that over L3 network?
>>>>>
>>>>> It would work over L2 Batman network. But not over L3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you looked into AHCP:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.irif.fr/~jch/software/ahcp/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ssssh! Why did you have to tell them about AHCP?
>>>>
>>>> ... *OBLIVIATE!*
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> marc/juul
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://mitar.tnode.com/
>> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
>>
>

--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m