~rper subsection 3.2.1.2, i will await confirmation from the conflict steward as to both or all parties' consent to me being the mediator.i am taking Rayc's "That there is active mediation happening (not rushed), through out the month with myself, and also with others" as his consent to enter mediation.the process for mediation is in sudoroom's articles of association [here]
<3On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Jake <jake@spaz.org> wrote:I was not satisfied with how this issue was treated at the meeting last night,
basically people started leaving and Melissa started yelling at Robert and I,
and while a conflict steward was selected (Dante) for Robert and Steve's
mediation, I didn't feel that people took seriously the issues that I brought
up which were actually separate from the specific attack against Robert.
I am asking for guidance on how to proceed with involving people at Sudoroom
(and Omni-wide) who have concerns with Steve's behavior and what we can do
about it, to make sure that he isn't excluding people from our space with his
unchecked behavior (as is happening now)
And I want to start a discussion/mediation that doesn't involve really angry
people screaming at each other across a meeting until everybody leaves. It's
not OK and i'm not willing to just move on and pretend everything is fine
because it's easier than dealing with the problem.
suggestions?
-jake
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Robert Chu wrote:
community it is up to us to be able to come together, put *some *communityAfter taking some time to think about this after the meeting. I ONLY feel
comfortable with Steven in the space if the following criteria is met:
Instead of Banning Steven for a set amount of time, I feel the following
compromise is admirable, and if no progress is made from this, then he be
asked to leave the space:
1. Steven's key access be revoked for one month from the space, and only
granted access back, after the community and Steven, has come together to
review progress, and positive changes, in the problematic behavior patterns
that have been detrimental to the space. Only then if everyone is in
agreement, then card access will be granted again.
2. Steven is only allow into the space if he is chaperoned by a mentor /
voucher / member / liaison, who is present while he is in the space (a
person would also be a mediary between him and myself)
3. That there is active mediation happening (not rushed), through out the
month with myself, and also with others whom have been sick and disrupted
by his behavior, for whatever reason i.e.use of the space (specifically
using this space as his house, and being territorial about it, and leaving
messes). With coordination from the mediation-stewart and mediator.
The Member-Mentor-Voucher-Liaison would vouch for Steven, will partly be
held accountable for any negative conduct, and also be able to work with
him directly to catch small things that maybe problematic.
- Exhibits a reasonable lack of self control
- Rudeness (carrying on as if he owns Sudoroom, is an A-hole to anyone that
tries to give constructive, positive feedback, on usage or behavior of the
space).
- Violate the SAFE SPACE POLICY
- Be aggressive or hostile toward anybody (repetitious I know)
- Dissisruptive yelling and/or outbursts (I will even ask another person to
ask him to leave if he has disruptive outbursts (as two meetings were
disrupted because of them.
- Verbal aggression anybody (and anything beyond that)
- Not claiming a specific work area/space as his own (camping out/being
hostile, or territorial about others working there)
- Not making a mess, - Not storing person items (unless they are
projects-NO PERSONAL STORAGE)
- I feel a month would be a sufficient for him to develop healthier habits
for a more productive space overall.
We all come from different backgrounds, and some communication styles or
lack therefore of sometimes need updating, and addressing.
Problematic people do come to the Omnis (for whatever reason(s). As a
investment together, to try to help/guide/coach/mentor that person to what
is acceptable (not net/negative), behaviour. And only then, only after
some community investment, has been put forth, we can clearly see if a
person will continue on as a disruption to the community, shall we ask that
person to definitely leave the space as (it would be net-negative).
The only shelter the Omni-commons is, is a shelter for the community to be
able to be a community. Not a place to shelter an individual's community
destructive behaviours. I think all of this as clearly as follows: If a
person's behaviors are having a tangible, net-negative impact on the
community (could be limited to one space), then they need to be addressed
(within reason). If that person does not have the capacity to change for
the overall health of the community, then that person must leave.
As stated in the beginning I would only feel comfortable with Steven in the
community ONLY he agreed to these requests, as I feel that a month of
additional guidance would help catalyst healthier behavior patterns, and
the community (including Steven) would coexist more seamlessly together.
The verbal assault altercation and clearly ignoring my requests all day to
not speak to me, is definitely an extreme, and in a lot of places he would
have been kicked out no questions asked!!! But I feel that he has the
ability to grow past this. As the victim of such abuse, I feel the typed
above would suffice, even though I am still uneasy about the situation.
As in the famous words of are neighboring hackerspace "Be excellent to each
other dudes." They just left out "And work on excellence toward each
other." (If there is a lack therefore of).
This is not to attack him, but to help coach new growth and ways, so that
all of what we are going through doesn't arise again. To me this is not a
community issue. It is a community including Steven issue.
Thanks for reading, and sorry if this is longer than a dissertation...
I will discuss with the Mediator and Mediatior. Stewart
H@kThEpLaNeT2G3thR
- RAYC
Robert Albert Young Chu
"Radiant Ambition Yields Change."
Call or Text :415-724-0425
Email: robert.chu01@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, robb <sf99er@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom> has no legal definitionAlso if people think I am being to dramatic when I state "bullying", here
is an excerpt from the Bullying page of Wikipedia
"Bullying can be defined in many different ways. The United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland
of bullying,[6] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying#cite_note-6> while
some states in the United States
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States> have laws against it.[7]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying#cite_note-7> Bullying is divided
into four basic types of abuse – emotional
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_abuse> (sometimes called
relational), verbal <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verbal_abuse>,
physical <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_abuse>, and cyber.[8]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying#cite_note-8> It typically
involves subtle methods of coercion, such as intimidation.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying
HIs actions reflected emotional abuse and verbal abuse, used to try to
intimidate me.
I also think it is bullying because he thought I might be to scared or
(dominated over) to do something about it, either that or I am not entirely
sure if he is aware of his own actions.
I stand against bullying, stand up for people being bullied, and choose
not to be a victim of bullying.
I don't have any friends or associates in my life that are bullies, or
treat me in a disrespectful way. Which is why I really don't even feel
comfortable mediating this with him at the current time.
Thank you for reading
Rayc
Robert Albert Young Chu
"Radiant Ambition Yields Change."
Call or Text :415-724-0425 <(415)%20724-0425>
Email: robert.chu01@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Robert Chu <robert.chu01@gmail.com>
wrote:
Call or Text :415-724-0425 <(415)%20724-0425>Hello Robb, thank you for your volunteering to do so. After reflecting
off of this for three days. I am still a bit shaken over the incident, and
don't think I even wish to mediate currently, my hands were truly shaking
for about two hours after his barrage of verbal assaults toward me. I don't
really even feel comfortable talking through a mediator with him as well at
the current time.
He tried bullying me to force me to feel sorry for him, for something in
which I clearly had done no wrong. He got pissed that I moved "his table",
because it had his laptop bag attached to it. "THERE IS NO PERSONAL STORAGE
AT SUDOROOM", if he didn't violate this, then this would not have
transpired."
Then I told him how I felt, not to talk to me and was insulted.
(assertion of dominance, again).
IMHO through his actions, he straight up bullied me and I defended
myself by contacting another Sudoroom member for support and advice on the
matter (who lucky enough was able to pick up during working business
hours). I felt like I was being whipped mentally everytime he would yell
over me yelling "F**K You" multiple times." And lying about owning a table.
I don't tolerate people like that and don't engage with them at all.
Currently in my life I am not friends, or even associated with anyone, who
acts in such ways at all.
THE SAFE SPACE POLICY WAS CLEARLY VIOLATED AS WELL!!!
Thank you Robb once again stepping up, and your support.
(even writing this is still eating at the back of my head)
Robert Albert Young Chu
"Radiant Ambition Yields Change."*First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,if either party wishes for someone to help mediate this matter, i am
available
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Steve Leach <stevenaleach@gmail.com>
wrote:
To the group as a whole, I apologizing for causing Robert stress, I
did yell at him outside the Omni, though only with the intent of
re-expressing something that I had expressed the previous day in a more
clear and somewhat comedic manner. It seemed that perhaps with his high
energy level, my normal tone the previous day had not registered because I
hadn't bothered to sound upset. So today I intentionally let him know that
I was upset. Now - the issue at hand is something I set myself up for: most
nights, especially when it is raining, I have made it a habit of leaving my
laptop in a basket under a table at the front. There's no pressing reason
to leave it there - my little abode is waterproof and lockable, but not
while I am asleep, and the unlikely scenario of someone opening the door
while I'm unconscious and managing to walk off with my irreplaceable gear
means I've felt safer leaving it semi-secured inside the building rather
than with me at night. Two days in a row, however, I found the basket with
my laptop bag sitting forlorn and alone in the middle of the floor in the
general 'donataions/hack-this' zone where I couldn't blame anyone if they
would have come before me and adopted it. I grumbled good naturedly at
Robert yesterday, just to point out the situation that resulted when the
table went away and suggested he should have taken the other table of the
pair -- or move the basket under the remaining table instead. Today, I
found the same scenario repeated and decided to actually show that I was
upset. If this apparently frightened or caused stress to Robert, I'm sorry
- that was neither my intention nor at all expected. I just chose to be a
little more theatrical and high energy in communicating with a boisterous
high energy individual who had disregarded my previous attempts at
communication. That he apparently mistook this as threatening is
unfortunate and unexpected - again, I was just trying to more match his
normal energy level and boisterousness since my more flat and
matter-of-fact communication previously had not worked. Again, sorry to all
for causing any unneeded chaos, and in the future I will avoid the problem
by simply keeping my laptop with me at night and therefore not having to
worry about it.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
then you win*.
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
--
*First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win*.
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
--First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.