"1. All decisions about the building are made through consensus, except when specified."
I would put it very explicitly in this section where those exceptions are enumerated. For example, "except when specified in section 2.3 of the articles..." Otherwise, people would be free to add cases that are exempt from our consensus process without changing this section.
On 2014-08-10 15:16, Jeremy Entwistle wrote:
Hello everybody! Before the meeting, I wanted to see if there were any revisions or blocks to my proposals. They're all regarding our governance structure and decisions making processes (as members of the omni). *Proposals* 1. All decisions about the building are made through consensus, except when specified. 2. When a decision needs to be made to secure the building, then a majority vote may be used to make the decision. The majority must be three-fourths of all voting members. These decisions include: a. Paying rent, utilities, and other liabilities of the collective b. Submitting legal documentation c. Suspensions and bans 3. Each collective may choose to use a delegate or distributed delegates to count as a single vote at the main meetings. Distributed delegates allows all members of collectives to make amendments or block proposals at main meeting. 4. Consensus formed through absence of clarifying questions and blocks. This removes the necessity to identify a delegate. The member(s) of the collective needs to be present to represent the consent of the collective. Quorum is still needed to make a decision. 5. The meetings are to give priority to updates from working groups and collectives. The last proposal should ensure we're having meetings where people are updated with what we've done and what we need to do instead of having long discussions about things that might be otherwise more appropriate for a working group or collective. Take care, Jeremy _______________________________________________ sudo-discuss mailing list sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss