Quorum takes 10 people. I really don't consider that a small group.I personally think that voting creates a tyranny of the majority which inherently oppresses minority groups. In a democracy, minorities have to hope for the benevolence of the majority to deign to stoop down low enough to recognize them as people.On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana@gmail.com> wrote:https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discussI would be wary, sudo, of how few people it already takes to have quorum, and if that changes...A small clique of friends can be at a meeting, and make decisions for all of sudo.It's a broken system.Our leaders can either say"there's the power, don't give it to anyone, let's split it consciously"or"where's the power? i don't see it"the latter is falsity in my opinion, it deters you from taking anythe former is truth.I think 1-vote-per-member; remotely solicited when live-vote isn't possible, is a much sounder way of representing the opinions and needs of many people.to my eyes, consensus seems to be closer to high school social dynamics than a step in political evolution. i'm definitely disillusioned about consensus after seeing this project.--On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, danarauz@gmail.com <danarauz@gmail.com> wrote::)On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Marc Juul <juul@labitat.dk> wrote:_______________________________________________On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana@gmail.com> wrote:My question is whose idea was this in the first place?
It was this guy:--marc/juul
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
<3 Rachel
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org