Agreed. The problem is that Almaz has not acted in good faith on
multiple occasions. If Almaz was to step down as GCEA organizer and
delegate and someone else from GCEA was to take over then it would
probably be possible to get consensus on this.

On 1/19/19, hol@gaskill.com <hol@gaskill.com> wrote:
> Asking for near-free rent after violating terms of space use does not
> seem to square with the way Almaz consistently condescends to the omni
> community; there seems to be a pattern of trying to bend the rules and
> obfuscate when she gets called out.  I don't attend the Omni meetings so
> maybe it's different live but my $.02 would be for sudo room to block
> this proposal and maintain focus on the fact that this collective has
> not held up its side of the financial or mutual respect dimensions
> agreed to as condition of membership iirc, and propose a change in
> membership status for GCEA if needed.
>
> On 2019-01-18 1:25 pm, Yardena Cohen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:36 PM Jenny Ryan <tunabananas@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> This is an extremely problematic issue on multiple fronts which I
>>> would like to discuss with Sudoers next Wednesday. Attached is sheer
>>> documentation, for y'allz edification.
>>
>> This doesn't add any new information IMO. They've acknowledged their
>> outstanding debt and they're asking for forgiveness and a change in
>> terms. Personally, I think it's a reasonable ask. I'm sick of this
>> conflict dragging on and I think we can just let them have their room
>> so we can stop wasting time arguing about it.
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
>> https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
> https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>