i totally agree that we should keep cool.
which is why i suggested, with enough lead time to make something real happen, that we re-visit the lease.

i was not concerned about liability until several specific comments made by Marc that made me worry about some plan he seemed to be hatching up.
also, though i understand that it most likely comes from Marc's strange attachment to demonstrating he's in charge at Sudo Room, when it is supposed to be a collective cooperative, i do feel the need to explain myself given the gross mischaracterization Marc seems capable of. 
the reason i was not as present this past summer as i'd hoped to be was because i was taking the CA bar so we can actually deal with the pending legal issues Sudo Room.


On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:23 AM, David Keenan wrote:

Hey Eddan/Marc et al,

This is the comment in the thread which says, "Lets keep cool heads here guys, we're all on the same side, we all want whatever's best for sudo, Lets all chill, I'm sure nothing undoable has been committed.."

If Eddan is immanently concerned about his personal liability with regards the lease, which is totally understandable, then yea his name on the lease should ideally be replaced by someone more comfortable with that and the potential risk it entails.. It seems to me that could/should happen ASAP? As doing so might help ease some of the tension in the present conversation, too.

BAPS' lease is i think still let to Zach Houston, which we also need to change stat, so maybe if nothing else both Sudo & Baps could meet with Laurie & George to change these particulars --

David

On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, rhodey wrote:
If you're referring to the SudoRoom meeting last Wednesday I can say
that having been there myself there was nothing close to consensus on
terminating the lease.

-- rhodey

On 10/01/2013 07:49 AM, Eddan Katz wrote:
> It was also based on your emphatic veto on any mitigating solution that
> involved any contact with our landlord in the last several meetings. As
> well as the decision, trailing back to three consecutive meetings, where
> it was decided to remove individual names for the lease.
>
> My apologies if I misunderstood you, Marc. I assumed you were being sincere.
>
>
> sent from eddan.com <http://eddan.com>
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Eddan Katz <eddan@clear.net
> <mailto:eddan@clear.net>> wrote:
>
>> This was based on the decision made at the meeting you held, Marc, and
>> based on the message you sent to the list about what was decided at
>> that meeting.
>>
>> sent from eddan.com <http://eddan.com>
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Marc Juul <juul@labitat.dk
>> <mailto:juul@labitat.dk>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Eddan Katz <eddan@clear.net
>>> <mailto:eddan@clear.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I've given notice to George & Laurie that we are terminating the
>>>     current lease at the end of December. George said he was
>>>     interested in putting up the Sudo Room section of the building
>>>     for co-op sale.
>>>
>>>
>>> Did sudo room agree to do this or did you just decide to go out and
>>> do this on your own?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marc
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org <mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org>
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss