This whole project is pretty dang awesome.

I wish I'd helped out more with it. It's one of those cases where people actually did stuff to solve a problem. Talking is cool, I love that and I encourage that, but when people complain then do something, that's so rare and nice.


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco@gmail.com> wrote:
You could have both computers mount the same remote file system if this were the issue.


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:44 PM, William Budington <bill@inputoutput.io> wrote:
On 06/10/2013 04:29 PM, J.C. wrote:
> Also, I would think any kind of plastic, wood or metal enclosure, screwed
> to the wall with a screwed in place cover would be sufficient, as it could
> also have a tamper switch if removed or opened inadvertently.
>
> I'll be around Wednesday to hack on such.
>

This sounds great!

>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:28 PM, J.C. <r33lmm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Would it make sense to hook up two pi's redundantly, have one as the
>>> primary for the keypad, and one as the primary for the rfid, and config
>>> them to be interchangeable, so if one goes down or is being hacked
on, the
>>> door is still fully functional.

The problem I see with this is that the two RasPi's would have to have
very similar file system structures, running the same services, with the
same codes (RFID and keypad).  We could set this up initially, but I
think it's very likely with the way things are hacked at hacker spaces
that the two will get out of sync, which means we'd have to periodically
clone one SD card from the other.  I think it would be kinda tricky.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss


_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss