I object that
sub-section 3.2 Conflict Resolution has not been followed in the least.
If it had been followed, then there would have been a facilitator chosen
before the meeting where a decision is made about my access. This is plainly indicated by
this graphic on the wiki and the text of that section.
Had this been followed, I would have been notified of conflict before judgement, and I would not have been subjected to treatment I received tonight by the law abiding members of sudoroom. I should have been notified by the facilitator as to the fact that I was involved in a conflict before judgement. That did not happen.
As stated in the same section 3.2.1 of sudo's own articles, conflict resolution should proceed in "the spirit of a collaborative environment" (ibid), and that the conflict, whatever it is, should be sought to a
restorative and not
retributive end (sub-section 3.2.1).
Furthermore, my presumed innocence (3.2.1) and respect for privacy and dignity (3.2.1) has been grossly violated by whatever process was followed last week at the sudo meeting, not to mention previous gossip that precipitated call to action and judgement without process.
A vote for consent is not process.
In short, the entire process was hijacked by an accusation and nobody in the system did anything to see that due process was served. The same process yall have worked so hard to codify to maintain a happy space. Only now that I have been "served" does anybody point to the code of laws and say what must follow.
In fact that same code does claim that I have rights within this supposed system, if I can even be said to be allowed to suppose section 3.2 is followed. Contrast this to a previous email in this thread stating I have "no rights". Well, do I, or do I not?
Sub-section 3.2.1 states I have "right to an appeal and a fair process"; clearly a fair process has not been followed, and it's a "right"...
if people are to take this process seriously, then this "case" needs to be tossed on account of "mistrial".
I'm perfectly willing to undergo a process if it attempts to live up to the code of conflict resolution.
