I would be wary, sudo, of how few people it already takes to have quorum, and if that changes...
A small clique of friends can be at a meeting, and make decisions for all of sudo. 
It's a broken system. 

Our leaders can either say 
"there's the power, don't give it to anyone, let's split it consciously"
 or
 "where's the power? i don't see it" 
the latter is falsity in my opinion, it deters you from taking any
the former is truth. 


I think 1-vote-per-member; remotely solicited when live-vote isn't possible, is a much sounder way of representing the opinions and needs of many people. 

to my eyes, consensus seems to be closer to high school social dynamics than a step in political evolution. i'm definitely disillusioned about consensus after seeing this project. 




On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, danarauz@gmail.com <danarauz@gmail.com> wrote:
:) 


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Marc Juul <juul@labitat.dk> wrote:


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana@gmail.com> wrote:

My question is whose idea was this in the first place?


It was this guy:
--
marc/juul


_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss





--
<3 Rachel