On Apr 26, 2013 7:18 PM, "Sonja Trauss" <sonja.trauss@gmail.com> wrote:

you're not a court, it doesnt set any precedent. If you do it this
time, and decide you dont like it, you can not do it later.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Andrew <andrew@roshambomedia.com> wrote:
> Another reason to have a suggested donation is if you are using a venue that
> doesn't allow a cover. I'll swing either way depending on the opinions of
> other members, but I would like to point out that this would set a precedent
> that non-free events are ok at Sudo Room as long as there is a door split.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Mark that is a great explanation!
>> Now that I think about it - I encountered that once when people were
>> selling-but-not-selling alcohol.
>> My vote does not matter at all, but I vote to just let them charge
>> admission, let them give you half. Things cost money, I don't think
>> there is anything wrong with openly acknowledging it and being
>> practical about it.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:47 PM, mark burdett <mfburdett@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Aside from the no-one-turned-away-for-lack-of-funds thing so broke
>> > people
>> > can attend, events often have a suggested donation because a film,
>> > recording, piece of music, etc. may be licensed for non-commercial use
>> > only.
>> > That means they would not permit the movie to be screened when an
>> > admission
>> > fee is charged. But you could suggest donations (another alternative
>> > would
>> > be sell food/snacks/etc.)
>> >
>> > --mark B.
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------
> Andrew Lowe
> Cell: 831-332-2507
> http://roshambomedia.com
>