Send discuss mailing list submissions to
        discuss@lists.omnicommons.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        discuss-request@lists.omnicommons.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        discuss-owner@lists.omnicommons.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Buy the building report back thread (Laura Turiano)
   2. Re: [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
      (Patrik D'haeseleer)
   3. Re: [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
      (Jenny Ryan)
   4. Re: [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
      (Yardena Cohen)
   5. Re: [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
      (Mary Ann Tenuto)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net>
To: "discuss@lists.omnicommons.org" <discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>, "consensus@lists.omnicommons.org" <consensus@lists.omnicommons.org>, "finance@lists.omnicommons.org" <finance@lists.omnicommons.org>
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:05:22 -0700
Subject: [omni-discuss] Buy the building report back thread
Everyone,

At the delegates meeting we discussed the proposal to buy the building by creating a tenants in common agreement between Omni Commons and one member collective that is a 501c3. Please see the proposal and additional information on the pad (pad.riseup.net/p/omninom) if you didn't see it before.

We agreed to update each other at least once a week on the progress of discussions in the collectives and the development of the contracts. This is the thread where we will put our updates.

Everyone is welcome to attend the Finance/fundraising working group meeting at 6pm on Mondays to get more information or raise any concerns/questions.

Laura





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Patrik D'haeseleer" <patrikd@gmail.com>
To: Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net>
Cc: "consensus@lists.omnicommons.org" <consensus@lists.omnicommons.org>, "discuss@lists.omnicommons.org" <discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>, "finance@lists.omnicommons.org" <finance@lists.omnicommons.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:34:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [omni-discuss] [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread

Thanks Laura,

One thing I didn't understand about the two-non-profit idea was whether this was just a temporary fix, and eventually the ownership of the building would be with the Omni, or whether the building will be shared in perpetuity between the Omni and Sudo.

If this is intended to be a permanent arrangement, I would greatly prefer setting up a new 501(c)3 just for the purpose of receiving the donation, even if that might take a bit longer to arrange.

Patrik

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net> wrote:

Everyone,

At the delegates meeting we discussed the proposal to buy the building by creating a tenants in common agreement between Omni Commons and one member collective that is a 501c3. Please see the proposal and additional information on the pad (pad.riseup.net/p/omninom) if you didn't see it before.

We agreed to update each other at least once a week on the progress of discussions in the collectives and the development of the contracts. This is the thread where we will put our updates.

Everyone is welcome to attend the Finance/fundraising working group meeting at 6pm on Mondays to get more information or raise any concerns/questions.

Laura


_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus@lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jenny Ryan <tunabananas@gmail.com>
To: "Patrik D'haeseleer" <patrikd@gmail.com>
Cc: "consensus@lists.omnicommons.org" <consensus@lists.omnicommons.org>, "discuss@lists.omnicommons.org" <discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>, "finance@lists.omnicommons.org" <finance@lists.omnicommons.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:49:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [omni-discuss] [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread

Replying all primarily for those I just subscribed who signed up for the mailing list at the end of the meeting - apologies! Your thoughts welcome and appreciated ~

Jenny

Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!

https://omnicommons.org/donate

`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`

"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson

"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
 -Hannah Arendt

"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd@gmail.com> wrote:

This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (patrikd@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Thanks Laura,

One thing I didn't understand about the two-non-profit idea was whether this was just a temporary fix, and eventually the ownership of the building would be with the Omni, or whether the building will be shared in perpetuity between the Omni and Sudo.

If this is intended to be a permanent arrangement, I would greatly prefer setting up a new 501(c)3 just for the purpose of receiving the donation, even if that might take a bit longer to arrange.

Patrik

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net> wrote:

Everyone,

At the delegates meeting we discussed the proposal to buy the building by creating a tenants in common agreement between Omni Commons and one member collective that is a 501c3. Please see the proposal and additional information on the pad (pad.riseup.net/p/omninom) if you didn't see it before.

We agreed to update each other at least once a week on the progress of discussions in the collectives and the development of the contracts. This is the thread where we will put our updates.

Everyone is welcome to attend the Finance/fundraising working group meeting at 6pm on Mondays to get more information or raise any concerns/questions.

Laura


_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus@lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus

_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus@lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yardena Cohen <yardenack@gmail.com>
To: Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net>
Cc: "consensus@lists.omnicommons.org" <consensus@lists.omnicommons.org>, "discuss@lists.omnicommons.org" <discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>, "finance@lists.omnicommons.org" <finance@lists.omnicommons.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:05:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [omni-discuss] [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net> wrote:
> pad.riseup.net/p/omninom

Hi all, I'm really sorry I'm not more involved right now and very much
appreciate all the work that's being done to make this project work! I
have some questions about this proposal...
* Why can't the donor just wait until January? Do they really need
that 2016 write-off?
* Would it work to create a new project that's fiscally sponsored by a
501c3? (like Sudo, CCL, FNB)
* Maybe we should get a second legal opinion on ways to make this
work. Anyone know a good accountant?

I don't know any behind-the-scenes info, but it seems like this would
fundamentally change how power works at Omni. Right now anybody in the
community can come to a delegates meeting or this list to voice their
concerns about use of space, but under this scheme, half the building
would be off limits. For instance, there's been a proposal to have a
co-working space in the basement, and some people have been blocking
consensus for a while because of their concerns. If hypothetically,
Sudoroom's 50% included the basement, there would be no way for people
to have any say. I'm not saying I'm for or against Marcus's plan, but
if there is strong opposition to it, it seems like a good thing that
people have a chance to talk it through rather than be forced to
accept it.

I would most like to hear from people who aren't Sudoroom members in
this conversation, because it seems they would have the most to lose.
I hope the fiscal urgency - and our desire to be polite to our
hard-working friends - doesn't overshadow questions about values and
power. I hope nobody feels pressured to keep quiet during this
process. That could do a lot of damage to the community.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mary Ann Tenuto <cezmat@igc.org>
To: Yardena Cohen <yardenack@gmail.com>
Cc: "consensus@lists.omnicommons.org" <consensus@lists.omnicommons.org>, "discuss@lists.omnicommons.org" <discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>, "finance@lists.omnicommons.org" <finance@lists.omnicommons.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:47:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [omni-discuss] [omni-consensus] Buy the building report back thread
I’m inclined to share some of Patrik’s and Yar’s feelings. I think it’s at least worth exploring/researching
the option of another nonprofit, which I believe was Option D in our meeting with Jesse. Since time is
of the essence, that would need to be an important first part of the exploration/research.

Mary Ann

> On Oct 7, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Yardena Cohen <yardenack@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Laura Turiano <scylla@riseup.net> wrote:
>> pad.riseup.net/p/omninom
>
> Hi all, I'm really sorry I'm not more involved right now and very much
> appreciate all the work that's being done to make this project work! I
> have some questions about this proposal...
> * Why can't the donor just wait until January? Do they really need
> that 2016 write-off?
> * Would it work to create a new project that's fiscally sponsored by a
> 501c3? (like Sudo, CCL, FNB)
> * Maybe we should get a second legal opinion on ways to make this
> work. Anyone know a good accountant?
>
> I don't know any behind-the-scenes info, but it seems like this would
> fundamentally change how power works at Omni. Right now anybody in the
> community can come to a delegates meeting or this list to voice their
> concerns about use of space, but under this scheme, half the building
> would be off limits. For instance, there's been a proposal to have a
> co-working space in the basement, and some people have been blocking
> consensus for a while because of their concerns. If hypothetically,
> Sudoroom's 50% included the basement, there would be no way for people
> to have any say. I'm not saying I'm for or against Marcus's plan, but
> if there is strong opposition to it, it seems like a good thing that
> people have a chance to talk it through rather than be forced to
> accept it.
>
> I would most like to hear from people who aren't Sudoroom members in
> this conversation, because it seems they would have the most to lose.
> I hope the fiscal urgency - and our desire to be polite to our
> hard-working friends - doesn't overshadow questions about values and
> power. I hope nobody feels pressured to keep quiet during this
> process. That could do a lot of damage to the community.
> _______________________________________________
> consensus mailing list
> consensus@lists.omnicommons.org
> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus



_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss