In my opinion, dialogue/accountability about what exactly is going to change, as well as transparency and true understanding around what the real needs at stake are, really needs to come first? As in, before anything else like forgiving debts or unilaterally locking up space can meaningfully be agreed to. Otherwise, it's not clear to me at least how such a solution as proposed would prevent the same problems from re-occurring at a systemic level in any way, which to my mind is more important for the collective health of omni and the community at large, that omni is in theory trying to be in solidarity with, than being able to lock this or that room, or forgive this or that debt. 

If real dialogue and real accountability dont come first, omni could conversely send a message of non-accountability, i.e. if the goal is simply a quid pro quo with no learning, no healing, and therefore no tangible reason for a rational person to believe anything will change for the better, which I would normally say is probably not what anyone wants.. but in this case, perhaps all bets are off idk. For some, the real goal may be for actually nothing to change, and for everything to stay the same as it is, because I also get that vibe.