On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Keenan <dkeenan44@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with batkid - and marc, in spirit - but I think it IS okay to accept recurring monies, we just have to be prepared to not compromise on any principles - if this hypothetical/non-hypothetical grant/donation-giving entity or entities defund us, that's their prerogative. If they try to influence us, then it's up to refuse their money at that time, or tell them to f off.

Ok. I think I actually made a mistake in bringing this up at all, since it totally _is_ hypothetical so we shouldn't worry about it until we have to. Also, I like your point.
 
In other words, it's on us to keep a grip on our principles, and not let outside forces unduly influence us...we do this through statements of principle, bylaws, consensus-based decision-making, etc. 

Money is fucking scary. I really feel that way. But let's see if we are strong enough to control it, rather than the other way around, provided we one day have enough cash to worry about its sauron-like influences

David




On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:44 PM, The Batkid <batkid@gmx.com> wrote:
> Would like to return to the idea that we should be generating other revenue
> streams into the picture of whatever standardized reporting format we choose.

The simplest, most efficient, and most rewarding revenue stream is
if members sign up for auto pay of their membership dues.
That's really all there is to it.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss


_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss