In the first case, I do not necessarily dispute that a majority vote overrules the facilitator, but I do not know where that is said to be able to happen (unless you are talking about replacing the facilitator with a new one, which is different and a bit more weighty). What were you thinking of?
hey all,
here are the changes I described in the mtg tonight: http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association%2FConstable&diff=2637&oldid=2635
This page's history has:(a) the current Articles(b) the proposal from tonight(c) my proposed changes// Matt
p.s.
I left out some bits about Facilitator and Exchequer, but the rest is mainly re-worded, reduced, and refined. The omitted pieces (due to unnecessary in the first case since majority vote already over-rules facilitator, and too specific for the second case):
Facilitator:
** Uses own best judgment to resolve ambiguity in the Articles of Association about how business is handled in meetings, but may be challenged in this by anyone who does not consent, which results in a majority vote on sustaining or overturning the Facilitator's judgment.
Exchequer:
** Receives dues and donations and pays expenses on behalf of the group, using the group's accounts.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss