In the second case, I added this because handling the money and being authorized to use the accounts was key to my being exchequer, and will remain so, and even if aspects of the processes of handling money are delegated, distributed, automated, (it happened with wepay a bit,) these basics remain necessary as a default.

On Mar 7, 2013 2:49 AM, "Matthew Senate" <mattsenate@gmail.com> wrote:
hey all,

here are the changes I described in the mtg tonight: http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association%2FConstable&diff=2637&oldid=2635

This page's history has:
(a) the current Articles
(b) the proposal from tonight
(c) my proposed changes

// Matt

p.s.

I left out some bits about Facilitator and Exchequer, but the rest is mainly re-worded, reduced, and refined. The omitted pieces (due to unnecessary  in the first case since majority vote already over-rules facilitator, and too specific for the second case):

Facilitator:

** Uses own best judgment to resolve ambiguity in the Articles of Association about how business is handled in meetings, but may be challenged in this by anyone who does not consent, which results in a majority vote on sustaining or overturning the Facilitator's judgment.

Exchequer:

** Receives dues and donations and pays expenses on behalf of the group, using the group's accounts.


_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss