Hello:
You have posted some interesting comments on the Shotspotters.
I have not followed the discussion in whole, so my comment may be redundant.
Last week, Oakland’s City Council and Mayor voted on measures to limit some aspect of DAC. Prior to voting on the bill, City Council presented the testimonies of representative of both Oakland’s Police and Fire Departments. Of interest, the representative from the Oakland Police Department disfavored continued use of the Shotspotters. He also disapproved of activating (tuning on) certain Shotspotters that are installed and on-line, but not green-lighted for operation.
I do not know the reason that OPD seeks to not use the Shotspotters, but I would assume there exists certain technical glitches or other things the do not aid in crime prevention or the capture of shooters.
On reasonable belief, some Shotspotters are in place at the Oakland Port. I believe these devices will remain operable throughout the next budget year.
IM
I think there are significant principles in here, maybe on everybody's mind but not called out specifically: if data is made available to the public, rather than made available only to the police, it's much more palatable. In either case, it's important that individual privacy not be infringed beyond some certain point. If all the data is public (and presented in a way that is structured & useful to the public,not some PDF report) then it's easier for everybody to see whether it is done in a way that respects individual privacy in appropriate ways.
Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]] on the wiki
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss