I think the more chairs we add, the more likely we are to get a complaint is all. And If we don't need em, I figure why put that risk out there.

On Friday, December 12, 2014, Torrie Fischer <tdfischer@hackerbots.net> wrote:

Maybe install a large folding bench onto the side of the building, like some
restaurants have.

On Friday, December 12, 2014 02:01:24 PM yar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, David Keenan <dkeenan44@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Great strides have been made visavis debris and garbage ending up outside,
> > and that is great. However, the newly-longer line of chairs chained up
> > outside the building, while useful of course, frankly is starting to look
> > too janky and an eyesore at this point.
> >
> > In order to improve somewhat the outside appearance of our building and
> > the
> > perception of neighbors, I would like to cut down on the number of outside
> > chairs. Basically, I think we should remove all but the bench and the
> > bare-metal chairs. IE, I think all the new white chairs should be removed.
> > It's just too much.
> >
> > In addition, by the way, technically we do not have permission from the
> > city to put any seating outside. I've looked at our property line and its
> > not clear actually that it extends a few feet from the building. Even if
> > it did, there is an easement with the city's sidewalk that means they
> > have control over it.
> >
> > I appreciate the doocratic effort to provide more outside seating, but can
> > we please remove these extra white chairs? Its overkill imo.
>
> Ok so where are people supposed to sit then? Would they prefer we
> sit/lie on the sidewalk instead?
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss