On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:44 PM, David Keenan <dkeenan44@gmail.com> wrote:

Both are valid and imbricated metrics

Word of the Day! :-)

Measuring the interior pixel lines in your 12ppi drawing of the bocce ball court room though in GIMP, I found that the bocce ball court room as measured by pixels (816px x 515px) was smaller than was listed the floor plan (I am heavily sleep deprived, so y'all correct me if I'm off.)

The scans of the floorplans are likely to have a little distortion. So I measured all the dimensions that were marked on the floorplan, figured out the conversion factor for each, checked that there wasn't too much difference between horizontal and vertical measurements and between each of the different floors, and then did a weighted sum to come up with the best overall rescaling. So if some of the measurements in the Bocce Court come out too low, that's probably because some of the others come out too high in comparison, and rescaling everything based on the Bocce court alone would just make things worse.

I think I kept all the dimensions printed on the floorplan where available, and estimated the rest based on the rescaled pixel size. That's the best I can do, other than sending someone in with a tape measure.

Should be close enough to come up with a reasonable pricing scheme at least. But yeah, eventually we should probably send someone to double-check...

Patrik