IMHO that seems excessively harsh. Banning someone from the list is
similar enough to banning them from the space, that it seems to me
such things entail a collective action by the community rather than
an administrative action or unilateral action by e.g. a list admin
or someone with keys to the door. Spambots and overt criminals are
one thing, but people who are merely annoying in some way are
another.
Really: With all the talk about anarcho-this and collectivist-that
and consensus-the-other-thing, seems to me that unilaterally banning
someone for being merely annoying is a pretty major contradiction to
core principles.
If you or someone else wants to ban someone from the list or the
space, aside from emergencies such as bots and criminals, there are
dispute-resolution processes in place for that.
So I'm going to stick my neck out and ask that you reinstate him on
the list, and initiate the use of whatever collective processes
exist for resolving the issues you have with him.
-G
=====
On 13-10-31-Thu 2:54 AM, Marc Juul
wrote: