banning someone for trying to set an actual fire in the building seems pretty cut and dried

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:17 PM Marc Juul <juul@labitat.dk> wrote:


On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:01 PM David Keenan <dkeenan44@gmail.com> wrote:
I am guessing the safe space ban process would be, he is safe-space banned by you, which could then be affirmed by Sudo and/or delegates to take to a consensed or group-level ban of a person. Then he presumably would be added to Omni's 'banned' page, with a brief description. 

We can also just consent to ban someone at either a collective's own meeting or Omni's meeting. Bringing conflicts directly to the Omni meeting shouldn't be done except as a last resort but I wouldn't categorize this as a conflict.

--
marc/juul
_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus@lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus