On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Jake <jake@spaz.org> wrote:
To do otherwise discredits our important conflict resolution process and disregards the basic rights of the accused.

Reminder: This is not a trial and we have no concept of "rights of the accused". It is bad that Johnny was not told that he was banned. The conflict resolution process is only available if a willing mediator and conflict steward is available and is only likely to resolve the conflict if both parties are willing to engage in mediation.

Johnny should be aware that he is also banned from Noisebridge per our cross-safe-space-ban policy.

The safe spaces mailing list has been notified.

--
marc/juul