Resurfacing this thread. I've incorporated Jeremy's proposal into a long-running proposal for redefining the Omni's governance processes here: http://wiki.omni-oakland.org/w/Governance/Proposal

Anyone interested in working on this is encouraged to add feedback to the bottom of this wiki page and/or attend governance working group meetings. Our next meeting is tomorrow, 7pm in the Omni mezzanine: http://wiki.omni-oakland.org/w/Event:2014/09/09_Governance_Meeting

This is a major proposal so will require some time and numerous iterations. The intent is to 1) loosen the power of existing Omni delegates toward a more open consensus model, 2) empower working groups to make decisions independent of the delegate meeting, and 3) to create terms for tenants in relation to member-groups and fiscally-sponsored projects of the OOC.

Jenny
http://jennyryan.net
http://thepyre.org
http://thevirtualcampfire.org
http://technomadic.tumblr.com

`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson

"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
 -Hannah Arendt

"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Jeremy Entwistle <jwentwistle@cryptolab.net> wrote:
That's a very good point, I'll make sure to specify that when we have
sections in our articles of association. Thanks for your input!

On 08/11/2014 11:53 AM, hol@gaskill.com wrote:
>
>
> "1. All decisions about the building are made through consensus, except
> when specified."
>
> I would put it very explicitly in this section where those exceptions
> are enumerated. For example, "except when specified in section 2.3 of
> the articles..." Otherwise, people would be free to add cases that are
> exempt from our consensus process without changing this section.
>
> On 2014-08-10 15:16, Jeremy Entwistle wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> Before the meeting, I wanted to see if there were any revisions or
>> blocks to my proposals. They're all regarding our governance structure
>> and decisions making processes (as members of the omni).
>>
>> *Proposals*
>>
>> 1. All decisions about the building are made through consensus, except
>> when specified.
>>
>> 2. When a decision needs to be made to secure the building, then a
>> majority vote may be used to make the decision. The majority must be
>> three-fourths of all voting members. These decisions include:
>> a. Paying rent, utilities, and other liabilities of the collective
>> b. Submitting legal documentation
>> c. Suspensions and bans
>>
>> 3. Each collective may choose to use a delegate or distributed delegates
>> to count as a single vote at the main meetings. Distributed delegates
>> allows all members of collectives to make amendments or block proposals
>> at main meeting.
>>
>> 4. Consensus formed through absence of clarifying questions and blocks.
>> This removes the necessity to identify a delegate. The member(s) of the
>> collective needs to be present to represent the consent of the
>> collective. Quorum is still needed to make a decision.
>>
>> 5. The meetings are to give priority to updates from working groups and
>> collectives.
>>
>> The last proposal should ensure we're having meetings where people are
>> updated with what we've done and what we need to do instead of having
>> long discussions about things that might be otherwise more appropriate
>> for a working group or collective.
>>
>> Take care,
>> Jeremy
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss [1]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss