Articles of Association/Constable - Revision history

50.0.83.116 at 04:00, 14 March 2013

2013-03-14T04:00:19Z

50.0.83.116 at 03:58, 14 March 2013

2013-03-14T03:58:04Z

Matt: makes changes, leaves one Facilitator change and one Exchequer change out, includes some re-wordings for simplicity, others to maintain consistent with some of the intentions of the previous drafts (e.g. Fairness, sizing of functionary roles).

2013-03-07T10:44:53Z

makes changes, leaves one Facilitator change and one Exchequer change out, includes some re-wordings for simplicity, others to maintain consistent with some of the intentions of the previous drafts (e.g. Fairness, sizing of functionary roles).

Show changes

Matt: Changes proposed in Articles ... /Draft as of Mar 7 2013 http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association/Draft&oldid=2625

2013-03-07T09:16:50Z

Changes proposed in Articles ... /Draft as of Mar 7 2013 http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association/Draft&oldid=2625

Show changes

Matt: articles as of feb 7, 2013 http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association&oldid=2365

2013-03-07T09:10:59Z

articles as of feb 7, 2013 http://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association&oldid=2365

New page

==Article 0. Name==

'''sudo room'''

==Article 1. Purpose==
* '''sudo room''' is an association of individuals (called "sudoers") established to collectively support a [[Sudo_room|creative community and hacker space]] with [[Sudo_room/methodology|corresponding values]].

===Values===
'''sudo room''' is an open, collaborative community of creators and practitioners working toward positive social change. '''sudo room''' chooses to:
#Value open, public discourses over closed, proprietary processes.
#Value access and transparency over exclusivity.
#Value solving real problems over hypotheticals, while respecting visions of the future.
#Value community and collaboration over isolation and competition.
#Value human judgment over automation and efficiency.
#Value do-ocracy over bureaucracy.
#Value safe space over ideology.

==Article 2. Membership==

===Section 2.0 Definition===

'''sudo room''' is a deliberative collective, meaning there is horizontal democratic control and participatory management of the organization, which is composed of all individual members. However, the group actively strives to substantially incorporate interested community participants and beneficiaries who are non-members. Members agree to decisions made by '''sudo room''' as well the terms of these Articles of Association and all future ammendments.

By using spaces or services operated by '''sudo room''', community participants and beneficiaries are obligated to respect all decisions by '''sudo room''' as well as the terms of these articles of association and all future amendments.

===Section 2.1 Qualifications for Membership===

* Membership is defined by fulfilling the following requirements:
*# Contributing monthly dues (sliding-scale with respect to operating costs) or equivalent.
*#* It is an express purpose of the group to keep membership rates low, and therefore accessible, as well as offer, when possible, alternatives to monetary contribution to suffice for monthly dues.
*# A status of good standing with the organization.
*#* Unresolved debts and/or substantial lapses in respecting the values of the organization and its members may result in suspension of membership, to be determined by fair process respecting individual rights and freedoms and the integrity of community norms.

===Section 2.2 Sudo Functionaries===

As a collective, functionary positions are voluntary roles taken on by willing members and intended to change regularly. No person may hold more than one position simultaneously, unless permitted by '''sudo room'''. The positions and respective duties are listed below:
* Facilitator
** Facilitate meetings by maintaining the agenda and ensuring topics are dealt with.
** Can be replaced at any time by some other member through friendly resignation or a simple majority vote. This is a non-confrontational aspect of the role to help facilitation proceed as fluidly as possible.
* Scribe
** Takes notes during meetings, collaborates with others to include their notes in final meeting minutes.
** Posts notes publicly after each meeting
** Can be replaced at any time by some other member through friendly resignation or a simple majority vote. This is a non-confrontational aspect of the role to help note-taking proceed as fluidly as possible.
* Exchequer
** Presents the budget during meetings, as articulated in the budget process below.
** Coordinates with Scribe to ensure budget-related information is accurate with respect to the budget process below.
** Can be replaced at any time by some other member through friendly resignation or a simple majority vote. This is a non-confrontational aspect of the role to help budget-reporting proceed as fluidly as possible.

===Section 2.3 Benefits===

The following are benefits available to all members:
* Usable assets and resources available within reasonable constraints of time and under the condition of sharing.
** '''sudo room''' strives to make assets and resources available to as many non-member participants and beneficiaries as possible.
** Note: no personal property should be stored in '''sudo room''' unless a system for personal storage can be provided by '''sudo room'''.
** Note: the use of '''sudo room''' environments for habitation and/or domestic use is strongly discouraged.
* Approved discounts and services negotiated through the collective purchasing power of '''sudo room'''.
** Items are up to the discretion of '''sudo room''' to determine through its budgeting and decision-making processes.
* A ''safe space,'' which is defined as:
** "A place where anyone can relax and be fully self-expressed, without fear of being made to feel uncomfortable, unwelcome, or unsafe on account of biological sex, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, cultural background, age, or physical or mental ability; a place where the rules guard each person's self-respect and dignity and strongly encourage everyone to respect others." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-space on Wikipedia].

==Article 3. Decision-Making==
===Section 3.0 Governance===
As a collective, '''sudo room''' members govern themselves and each retains equal rights and mutual responsibilities.
====Sub-Section 3.0.0 Meetings====
* Meetings are held regularly, with sufficient notice for interested members to participate.
* A meeting to conduct official business of sudo room must include at least 10 members.

====Sub-Section 3.0.1 Agenda====
Agendas will be initiated with a default structure left open to addition until the beginning of the next meeting. Additions to the agenda during the meeting require a simple majority to be added, otherwise they are tabled to the next meeting.

Agenda structure:
# Announcements / Updates
#* '''Decision Procedure:''' Not applicable during meetings.
#* Public announcements may be objected to with timely notice and the burden on the objector.
# Fiscal Solvency (Budget)
#* '''Decision Procedure:''' Automatically approve the budget formed using the procedure outlined below. All amendments to the automatic budget must be made using a consensus process.
# Enforcement / Conflict Resolution
#* '''Decision Procedure:''' ''Fair Process'' described below.
# Proposals for Amendment
#* '''Decision Procedure:''' Follow ''"Amendments" Article '' below.
# Endorsements
#* '''Decision Procedure:''' By consensus.
#* Official '''sudo room''' endorsements of other events, activities, groups, or actions.

===Section 3.4 Enforcement===
====Sub-Section 3.4.0 Process====
The resolution of disputes and disagreements within '''sudo room''' is encouraged through informal process and the spirit of a collaborative environment. There is a process, however, by which issues that are not resolved informally and that arise within the scope of these articles of association, should be considered:
# Conflict resolution is attempted through the facilitation of a consenting, neutral, mutually agreed-upon third-party.
# The issue is added to the official '''sudo room''' wiki to be added to the agenda of the next official meeting, save any issues with significant privacy concerns.
# At the beginning of each meeting's agenda item on Enforcement and Conflict Resolution, all unresolved issues on the wiki will be categorized into one of several types. They will be categorized using '''consensus''' and reflecting '''sudo room''''s above values. The categories are (in order of decreasing severity):
## Membership suspension or termination.
##* '''Decision Procedure:''' 2/3 vote
## Safe space.
##* '''Decision Procedure:''' 2/3 vote
## Purely fiscal.
##* '''Decision Procedure:''' 1/2 vote
## Default.
##* '''Decision Procedure:''' Consensus
## Positive feedback.
##* '''Decision Procedure:''' Auto-approval
# The opportunity to represent their perspective is granted to each relevant person, and general discussion may be held about the issue.
# A decision is made by '''sudo room''' to resolve the issue as best as possible, according to the values constituting these articles of association.

====Sub-Section 3.4.1 Fairness====
Due process in the resolution of conflicts must include:
# the right to an appeal and a fair tribunal
# the presumption of innocence and the respect for privacy; and
# proportionality and effective remedies.

===Section 3.5 Corporate and Tax Status===

The diversity of organizational structures shall be preserved, in order to maintain the opportunity for the most effective means of instituting incentives for creativity and innovation.

===Section 3.6 Fiscal Solvency===
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At_6qzhQZBX8dHU0bWZaNkxpSkcyeG5WMVRwMVQ4aWc#gid=4 FYI, here are the fiscal solvency sheets ya'll]
====Sub-Section 3.6.0 Assets====
* '''sudo room''' assets are managed through member benefits above and the budgeting process below.
====Sub-Section 3.6.1 Budgeting====
'''sudo room''' employs a transparent, and collaborative budgeting process that attempts to reflect the shared values of all members as articulated by the group's purpose. The budget is located (insert link here). It is managed through the following procedure each month:

# Determine if membership dues can be reduced
# Transparently prioritize budget allocations. (In no particular order) allocate income to match expenditures, contribute to standing funds, and determine remaining surplus
# Any surpluses that remains will be divided based on member contribution and treated as ''internal credits'' (or a ''soft dividend'') available for members to:
## Leave to the discretion of '''sudo room''' to allocate
## Allocate in the budget, at the member's discretion, to various available '''internal projects''' as defined below.
## Provide as future contributions to membership dues.
* '''Note:''' there is a substantial distinction for ''external projects'' as defined below.

* To ensure stability, '''sudo room''' must maintain several standing funds:
** 3 months worth of rent + utilities
** Rainy Day fund (for emergency expenditures)
** Maintenance fund (for necessary infrastructure replacements)
** Operations fund (for necessary, small operational expenditures)

====Sub-Section 3.6.2 Income====
'''sudo room''' accrues income through several sources, including events, crowd-funding initiatives, and membership dues.

====Sub-Section 3.6.3 Dues====
The recommended monthly dues for members is calculated as follows:
* dues = average over all members of ( 1 month's overhead + a % of any defecit in each standing fund + a risk premium (min. 5% of all other dues components)
** For instance, early on, overhead could be (rent + utilities + services), in which case dues = (500 + 100 + 20 + (10 + 5 + 0 + 10) + 64) / 23 = $30.83 per member

====Sub-Section 3.6.4 Expenditures====
* Internal Projects
** Infrastructure, maintenance and improvements.
** Capital Projects
* External Projects
** Not funded this way. Use alternative methods, such as through discounts or crowd-funding opportunities offered as Benefits above.
====Sub-Section 3.6.5 Surplus====
'''sudo room''' strives to maintain a zero-sum budget, in which there is no surplus.
* Definition: surplus = income - expenditures - standing funds

==Article 4. Amendments==

===Section 4.1 Process===
The process to amend these articles of association entails:
# Announcing the proposed amendment, posted:
#* On the official '''sudo room''' wiki.
#* On the '''sudo room''' ''discussion'' email list
#* At least 1 week before the meeting at which a vote on the amendment will be held
# Recieving feedback and commentary posted:
#* On the official '''sudo room''' wiki.
#* On the official '''sudo room''' anonymous etherpad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/sudoroom
#* On any '''sudo room''' email list.
# Adding an agenda item to an official meeting's agenda.
#* The agenda item includes time to review the feedback, recieve in-person feedback, and discuss.
#*'''Decision procedure:''' Consensus

===Section 4.2 Dissolution / Termination of Association===
Dissolution must be proposed in the same manner as all other amendments to these articles. For clarity, the decision procedure will use '''consensus'''.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 13 March 2013
Line 102:		Line 102:
	## The '''Conflict Steward''', '''Mediator''', and the conflicting parties arrange to meet to work out a resolution to which all conflicting parties consent.		## The '''Conflict Steward''', '''Mediator''', and the conflicting parties arrange to meet to work out a resolution to which all conflicting parties consent.
	# If at least one conflicting party does not consent to meet, or if at least one conflicting party is unavailable to meet in a reasonable time, all relevant circumstances considered, or if the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' agree after at least one meeting that further meetings would not be likely to lead to resolution, the issue is brought before the group in the following way:		# If at least one conflicting party does not consent to meet, or if at least one conflicting party is unavailable to meet in a reasonable time, all relevant circumstances considered, or if the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' agree after at least one meeting that further meetings would not be likely to lead to resolution, the issue is brought before the group in the following way:
	## The issue is added to the agenda of the next official meeting scheduled at least one week in the future, and documentation is gathered by the '''Conflict Steward''' and made available to the group at least one week beforehand (on wiki), and notice is broadcast to the group (on mailing list), but information that would compromise anyone's privacy or dignity is not made public. In the description of the issue, the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is included. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must give their approval of the factual content of the documentation before it is posted. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must expressly affirm that the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is consistent with '''sudo room's''' values. The request for remedy must include an implementation plan approved by the '''Conflict Steward''' and the '''Mediator''' if it is not obvious how to implement it.		## The issue is added to the agenda of the next official meeting scheduled at least one week in the future, and documentation is gathered by the '''Conflict Steward''' and made available to the group at least one week beforehand (on wiki), and notice is broadcast to the group (on mailing list), but information that would compromise anyone's privacy or dignity is not made public. In the description of the issue, the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is included. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must give their approval of the factual content of the documentation before it is posted. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must expressly affirm that the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is consistent with '''sudo room's''' [[Articles of Association#Values \| values]]. The request for remedy must include an implementation plan approved by the '''Conflict Steward''' and the '''Mediator''' if it is not obvious how to implement it.
	## During each meeting's agenda item on Conflict Resolution, all unresolved issues on the wiki are brought up for discussion followed by a vote.		## During each meeting's agenda item on Conflict Resolution, all unresolved issues on the wiki are brought up for discussion followed by a vote.
	### First, the '''Conflict Steward''' presents all relevant documentation about the issue.		### First, the '''Conflict Steward''' presents all relevant documentation about the issue.
Line 116:		Line 116:
	### Then, members may propose alternative remedies to the conflict, along with any appropriate implementation plans.		### Then, members may propose alternative remedies to the conflict, along with any appropriate implementation plans.
	### Finally, a vote is held on the plaintiff(s)' proposed remedy, and then alternative remedies are voted upon in the order they were proposed, but only if at least one member indicates that the remedy under consideration is still relevant. After all remedies have been considered in this way, the matter is considered resolved. The '''Conflict Steward''' then ensures all relevant parties understand the remedy or remedies that passed and any corresponding implementation plans.		### Finally, a vote is held on the plaintiff(s)' proposed remedy, and then alternative remedies are voted upon in the order they were proposed, but only if at least one member indicates that the remedy under consideration is still relevant. After all remedies have been considered in this way, the matter is considered resolved. The '''Conflict Steward''' then ensures all relevant parties understand the remedy or remedies that passed and any corresponding implementation plans.
	### Any conflicting party unsatisfied with the decision may place an appeal on the agenda in the same way that conflicts are placed on the agenda, except that a majority of the group must vote to accept the appeal during a meeting, and the process begins anew. The appeal must propose an alternative remedy and refer to values that were not served by the original decision.		### Any conflicting party unsatisfied with the decision may place an appeal on the agenda in the same way that conflicts are placed on the agenda, except that a majority of the group must vote to accept the appeal during a meeting, and the process begins anew. The appeal must propose an alternative remedy and refer to [[Articles of Association#Values \| values]] that were not served by the original decision.
	### If at the end of any step in the process more than an hour has passed during the current meeting in considering the conflict, any member may request that a majority vote be held on whether to table the conflict until the next meeting.		### If at the end of any step in the process more than an hour has passed during the current meeting in considering the conflict, any member may request that a majority vote be held on whether to table the conflict until the next meeting.

Line 122:		Line 122:
	In the pursuit of fairness, due process in the resolution of conflicts must include:		In the pursuit of fairness, due process in the resolution of conflicts must include:
	# Presumption of innocence.		# Presumption of innocence.
	# Right to an appeal and a fair ~~tribunal~~.		# Right to an appeal and a fair process.
	# Respect for the privacy and dignity of all members.		# Respect for the privacy and dignity of all members.
	# Proportional and effective remedies.		# Proportional and effective remedies.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 13 March 2013
Line 50:		Line 50:
	** Co-facilitates (with the Facilitator) the budget process below.		** Co-facilitates (with the Facilitator) the budget process below.

	* ~~Constable~~		* Conflict Steward
	** Facilitates the conflict resolution process according to the Articles of Association, but not necessarily a moderator.		** Facilitates the conflict resolution process according to the Articles of Association, but not necessarily a moderator.
	** Stewards selection of a moderator and schedules meetings among conflicting parties and moderator.		** Stewards selection of a moderator and schedules meetings among conflicting parties and moderator.
Line 56:		Line 56:
	** Promotes good-faith participation in the process by conflicting parties on a basis of mutual respect and growth towards better relationships and a stronger community.		** Promotes good-faith participation in the process by conflicting parties on a basis of mutual respect and growth towards better relationships and a stronger community.
	** If conflict resolution goes before the whole group, co-facilitates with Facilitator, and handles points of information about conflict resolution with reference to the documentation.		** If conflict resolution goes before the whole group, co-facilitates with Facilitator, and handles points of information about conflict resolution with reference to the documentation.
	** Does not act as ~~Constable~~ in conflicts involving self.		** Does not act as Conflict Steward in conflicts involving self.

	===Section 2.3 Benefits===		===Section 2.3 Benefits===
Line 86:		Line 86:
	# Fiscal Solvency (Budget)		# Fiscal Solvency (Budget)
	#* '''Decision Procedure:''' Automatically approve the budget formed using the procedure outlined below. All amendments to the automatic budget must be made using a consensus process.		#* '''Decision Procedure:''' Automatically approve the budget formed using the procedure outlined below. All amendments to the automatic budget must be made using a consensus process.
	# ~~Enforcement /~~ Conflict Resolution		# Conflict Resolution
	#* '''Decision Procedure:''' ''Fair Process'' described below.		#* '''Decision Procedure:''' ''Fair Process'' described below.
	# Proposals for Amendment		# Proposals for Amendment
Line 94:		Line 94:
	#* Official '''sudo room''' endorsements of other events, activities, groups, or actions.		#* Official '''sudo room''' endorsements of other events, activities, groups, or actions.

	===Section 3.2 ~~Enforcement~~===		===Section 3.2 Conflict Resolution===
	====Sub-Section 3.2.0 Process====		====Sub-Section 3.2.0 Process====
	The resolution of disputes and disagreements within '''sudo room''' is encouraged through informal process and the spirit of a collaborative environment. There is a process, however, by which issues that are not resolved informally and that arise within the scope of these articles of association:		The resolution of disputes and disagreements within '''sudo room''' is encouraged through informal process and the spirit of a collaborative environment. There is a process, however, by which issues that are not resolved informally and that arise within the scope of these articles of association:
	# The party who seeks resolution finds someone to act as '''~~Constable~~''' in the matter, and works with this '''~~Constable~~''' to find a '''Mediator'''.		# The party who seeks resolution finds someone to act as '''Conflict Steward''' in the matter, and works with this '''Conflict Steward''' to find a '''Mediator'''.
	## The '''Mediator''' is an impartial and uninvolved third party who consents to assist, and with whom all conflicting parties consent to work toward a solution.		## The '''Mediator''' is an impartial and uninvolved third party who consents to assist, and with whom all conflicting parties consent to work toward a solution.
	## The '''~~Constable~~''' organizes meetings for conflict resolution and maintains records of all meetings and relevant communications among the conflicting parties.		## The '''Conflict Steward''' organizes meetings for conflict resolution and maintains records of all meetings and relevant communications among the conflicting parties.
	## The '''~~Constable~~''', '''Mediator''', and the conflicting parties arrange to meet to work out a resolution to which all conflicting parties consent.		## The '''Conflict Steward''', '''Mediator''', and the conflicting parties arrange to meet to work out a resolution to which all conflicting parties consent.
	# If at least one conflicting party does not consent to meet, or if at least one conflicting party is unavailable to meet in a reasonable time, all relevant circumstances considered, or if the '''~~Constable~~''' and '''Mediator''' agree after at least one meeting that further meetings would not be likely to lead to resolution, the issue is brought before the group in the following way:		# If at least one conflicting party does not consent to meet, or if at least one conflicting party is unavailable to meet in a reasonable time, all relevant circumstances considered, or if the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' agree after at least one meeting that further meetings would not be likely to lead to resolution, the issue is brought before the group in the following way:
	## The issue is added to the agenda of the next official meeting scheduled at least one week in the future, and documentation is gathered by the '''~~Constable~~''' and made available to the group at least one week beforehand (on wiki), and notice is broadcast to the group (on mailing list), but information that would compromise anyone's privacy or dignity is not made public. In the description of the issue, the form of ~~redress~~ sought by the plaintiff(s) is included. Both the '''~~Constable~~''' and '''Mediator''' must give their approval of the factual content of the documentation before it is posted. Both the '''~~Constable~~''' and '''Mediator''' must expressly affirm that the form of ~~redress~~ sought by the plaintiff(s) is consistent with '''sudo room's''' values. The request for ~~redress~~ must include an implementation plan approved by the '''~~Constable~~''' and the '''Mediator''' if it is not obvious how to implement it.		## The issue is added to the agenda of the next official meeting scheduled at least one week in the future, and documentation is gathered by the '''Conflict Steward''' and made available to the group at least one week beforehand (on wiki), and notice is broadcast to the group (on mailing list), but information that would compromise anyone's privacy or dignity is not made public. In the description of the issue, the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is included. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must give their approval of the factual content of the documentation before it is posted. Both the '''Conflict Steward''' and '''Mediator''' must expressly affirm that the form of remedy sought by the plaintiff(s) is consistent with '''sudo room's''' values. The request for remedy must include an implementation plan approved by the '''Conflict Steward''' and the '''Mediator''' if it is not obvious how to implement it.
	## During each meeting's agenda item on Conflict Resolution, all unresolved issues on the wiki are brought up for discussion followed by a vote.		## During each meeting's agenda item on Conflict Resolution, all unresolved issues on the wiki are brought up for discussion followed by a vote.
	### First, the '''~~Constable~~''' presents all relevant documentation about the issue.		### First, the '''Conflict Steward''' presents all relevant documentation about the issue.
	### Then, a category of severity is established by '''consensus''' according to '''sudo room''''s values and the facts of the case. The category determines the voting threshold for sustaining a sanction against any party to the conflict. The categories are (in order of decreasing severity):		### Then, a category of severity is established by '''consensus''' according to '''sudo room''''s [[Articles of Association#Values \| values]] and the facts of the case. The category determines the voting threshold for sustaining a sanction against any party to the conflict. The categories are (in order of decreasing severity):
	#### Conflict calling for membership suspension or termination.		#### Conflict calling for membership suspension or termination.
	####* '''Decision Procedure:''' 2/3 vote		####* '''Decision Procedure:''' 2/3 vote
Line 112:		Line 112:
	#### All other conflicts.		#### All other conflicts.
	####* '''Decision Procedure:''' Consensus		####* '''Decision Procedure:''' Consensus
	### Then, the opportunity to represent perspective is granted to each conflicting party and to the '''Mediator''', and general discussion may be held about the issue if any member wishes. The '''~~Constable~~''' co-facilitates with the '''Facilitator''' in order to answer questions specific to the conflict and provides information about the history of the conflict by referring to the documentation.		### Then, the opportunity to represent perspective is granted to each conflicting party and to the '''Mediator''', and general discussion may be held about the issue if any member wishes. The '''Conflict Steward''' co-facilitates with the '''Facilitator''' in order to answer questions specific to the conflict and provides information about the history of the conflict by referring to the documentation.
	### Then, a brief period of deliberation of definite time is held, during which members are free to consider the issue or discuss it directly with others.		### Then, a brief period of deliberation of definite time is held, during which members are free to consider the issue or discuss it directly with others.
	### Then, members may propose alternative remedies to the conflict, along with any appropriate implementation plans.		### Then, members may propose alternative remedies to the conflict, along with any appropriate implementation plans.
	### Finally, a vote is held on the plaintiff(s)' proposed remedy, and then alternative remedies are voted upon in the order they were proposed, but only if at least one member indicates that the remedy under consideration is still relevant. After all remedies have been considered in this way, the matter is considered resolved. The '''~~Constable~~''' then ensures all relevant parties understand the remedy or remedies that passed and any corresponding implementation plans.		### Finally, a vote is held on the plaintiff(s)' proposed remedy, and then alternative remedies are voted upon in the order they were proposed, but only if at least one member indicates that the remedy under consideration is still relevant. After all remedies have been considered in this way, the matter is considered resolved. The '''Conflict Steward''' then ensures all relevant parties understand the remedy or remedies that passed and any corresponding implementation plans.
	### Any conflicting party unsatisfied with the decision may place an appeal on the agenda in the same way that conflicts are placed on the agenda, except that a majority of the group must vote to accept the appeal during a meeting, and the process begins anew. The appeal must propose an alternative remedy and refer to values that were not served by the original decision.		### Any conflicting party unsatisfied with the decision may place an appeal on the agenda in the same way that conflicts are placed on the agenda, except that a majority of the group must vote to accept the appeal during a meeting, and the process begins anew. The appeal must propose an alternative remedy and refer to values that were not served by the original decision.
	### If at the end of any step in the process more than an hour has passed during the current meeting in considering the conflict, any member may request that a majority vote be held on whether to table the conflict until the next meeting.		### If at the end of any step in the process more than an hour has passed during the current meeting in considering the conflict, any member may request that a majority vote be held on whether to table the conflict until the next meeting.