[sudo-discuss] It's Unconscionable
Michael Scroggins
michaeljscroggins at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 18:07:37 PST 2013
I think a statement is well and proper. I also think arguing the right
to disinterest inquiry is the proper line.
To the earlier back and forth about "known gang members" ... one of the
differences between the people at SudoRoom and "known gang members" is
simply that to be classified as "known" is to be stripped of your right
to disinterested inquiry. All of your actions having been prejudged as
interested and malicious.
If the letter is worded right we can make a statement about the lock
picking class and about the direction policing in Oakland has taken.
Michael
Eddan Katz wrote:
> J.D. - do you think there should be an additional statement from Sudo
> Room?
>
> Before we proceed any further - does anyone have objections to writing
> such a letter or signing on to it? What the statement says is another
> matter for which Sudo member objections should also feel empowered to
> raise. Comments can be made anonymously on the etherpad or on IRC, if
> someone isn't comfortable doing it on the list.
>
> sent from eddan.com <http://eddan.com>
>
> On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:15 PM, "J.D. Zamfirescu" <zamfire at gmail.com
> <mailto:zamfire at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, we were hoping to publish it tonight. Let me try to draft
>> something and send it on?
>>
>> Part of me is concerned about editing a public statement on a public
>> list...
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Eddan <eddan at clear.net
>> <mailto:eddan at clear.net>> wrote:
>>
>> J.D. - where were you thinking of publishing this letter?
>>
>> I think it would make for a stronger and more thoughtful response
>> if there was a collective voice signing on to it either as a
>> group or listed as individuals.
>>
>> With the help of the collective editorial prowess of the Sudo
>> list, do you think you would be ready to publish it before
>> tomorrow morning?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Eddan <eddan at clear.net
>> <mailto:eddan at clear.net>> wrote:
>>
>> I think the question is, rather - Can you get hired by a
>> locksmith company without knowing how to pick a lock?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:01 PM, <thadwooster at gmail.com
>> <mailto:thadwooster at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I could be totally wrong on this, but I believe
>> locksmiths are required to be bonded, fingerprinted and
>> licensed.
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2013, at 4:59 PM, rusty lindgren wrote:
>>
>>> WTF #@*)DKLJ
>>>
>>> I sent an email to that newb at the newspaper... UM,
>>> where do they think locksmiths learn stuff? Should they
>>> have to pay to become a locksmith???
>>>
>>> So stupid.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Marina Kukso
>>> <marina.kukso at gmail.com <mailto:marina.kukso at gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ftfy!: THIS is unconscionable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Eddan
>>> <eddan at clear.net <mailto:eddan at clear.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now, this requires a response. Has anybody
>>> started drafting something? If not, I will.
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan
>>> <http://www.sfgate.com/?controllerName=search&action=search&channel=bayarea&search=1&inlineLink=1&query=%22Howard+Jordan%22> was
>>> not pleased.
>>>
>>> "I'm in shock that people would provide a class
>>> to teach people a skill to violate the law,"
>>> Jordan said. "It's unconscionable."
>>>
>>> Lock-pick instructor Michael Fitzhugh
>>> <http://www.sfgate.com/?controllerName=search&action=search&channel=bayarea&search=1&inlineLink=1&query=%22Michael+Fitzhugh%22> is
>>> a member of TOOOL (The Open Organisation Of
>>> Lockpickers
>>> <http://www.sfgate.com/?controllerName=search&action=search&channel=bayarea&search=1&inlineLink=1&query=%22Open+Organisation+Of+Lockpickers%22>),
>>> a Netherlands-based outfit that teaches and
>>> holds national and international lock-picking
>>> events annually. In their world, lock picking is
>>> done for sport and bragging rights. But, he
>>> says, it's also a useful tool if you lock
>>> yourself out of your home.
>>>
>>> Jordan has a more conventional solution to that
>>> problem: "Call a locksmith!"
>>>
>>> http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Quan-s-wrong-note-on-lock-picking-class-4318130.php
>>>
>>>
>>> Even worse than Quan, this guy's so desperate to
>>> change the subject about the incompetence of the
>>> OPD in news story after news story.
>>>
>>> Unconscionable!?! This coming from a police
>>> department that was about to go into an
>>> unprecedented federal receivership for its
>>> failure to reform; not to mention a police
>>> department seared with a global reputation for
>>> brutality, racism, and excessive means; and
>>> whose fundamental miscalculations and
>>> mismanagement of the response to Occupy cost the
>>> city millions of dollars.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>> <mailto:sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>> <mailto:sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rusty Lindgren
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>>> <mailto:sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> <mailto:sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> <mailto:sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org>
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20130228/7d4b563c/attachment.html>
More information about the sudo-discuss
mailing list