[sudo-discuss] [Articles of Association] Sugested change to values

[Matthew Senate]

Sorry Hol, I have to interrupt your email with a Point of Process:

I don't think this proposal should go back on the table because it fell off
and it has a nasty dust bunny stuck in the frosting.

// Satt Menate


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Hol Gaskill <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:

> all of those words make sense to me - should we attempt to define
> bureaucracy somehow?  i volunteer to spearhead a committee to report in
> every 3 weeks and collect input from members via approved channels, which
> will then be reprocessed through cumulative human error then regurgitated
> according to whatever schedule is ratified by a separate subcommittee which
> I leave to someone else to spearhead and really get the ball rolling.
>
>
> Feb 5, 2014 09:05:41 PM, mattsenate at gmail.com wrote:
> Hey all,
> >
> >Thinking about hacking the values a bit based on our continued
> experience. What do folks think about adding this new value to guide us
> into the grayer, murkier, brighter, and wonderful future?
> >
>
> >"Value fairness and common sense over prolonged process and bureaucracy."
> >
> >You can see it here:
> https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association/Value_fairness
> >
>
> >And the diff:
> https://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association%2FValue_fairness&diff=7235&oldid=7234
> >
>
> >// Matt
> >
>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >sudo-discuss mailing list
> >sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
> >http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20140206/58e7d6ce/attachment.html>