[sudo-discuss] [BAPS-Organizing] Re: Backspace Space proposal

[Sara Larsen]

I want to thank you Yar for this incredible letter. Needless to say, I
support the views you expressed 100%!

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Scott Nanos <scott.nanos at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree 200% w/ yar and hope we can come to a conclusion that works for
> all of us (particularly for backspace). I can't come to this thurs meeting
> but my fingers are crossed double crossed triple crossed. Hoping Baps and
> backspace can team up to become champions of the commons <3
>
> Xo
>
> Scott
>
> > On Oct 20, 2014, at 8:28 AM, yar <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, yar <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It's not your fault, it's not anybody else's fault either. I really
> >> hope the confusion isn't interpreted as bad faith or a lack of
> >> support. We all need to get better at that, of course, but also get
> >> better at forgiving each others' mistakes, in the spirit of jubilee.
> >
> > I want to just reiterate this in light of the past few days of
> > conversation. I have heard a lot of different narratives about what
> > happened with Backspace over the past few months. I don't claim to
> > know exactly what happened anymore, but it seems to boil down to a
> > huge string of communication failures that resulted in Backspace
> > paying for space to operate, yet having no space until now.
> >
> > At Thursday's meeting, the subject of past-due utility bills came up,
> > but it seems apropos to mention that lots of Omni groups have not paid
> > utility bills, or even rent, and one of the amazing potential things
> > about Omni is our capacity to be a non-evil landlord - each according
> > to their ability and their need.
> >
> > It's clear that most backspace folks are WORKERS whose primary concern
> > is being able to see their clients and students and make a living
> > wage. It's also clear to me that the primary benefit of having
> > Backspace at Omni is NOT the money they'd bring in, but the new
> > people, energy and perspectives. It would REALLY SUCK if we lost all
> > that by fighting with them over money.
> >
> > Other than money, the only other concern I'm hearing about this
> > proposal is about space. While I have expressed concerns about
> > "enclosure" in the past, Backspace's plans for the den or "storage
> > room" are NOT enclosures. They're stewardship of commons. This is
> > exactly the model I always dreamed of for our building!
> >
> > Finally, there's BAPS. I think it might help to separate BAPS'
> > pragmatic need to host many evening classes from BAPS' position as a
> > roving "nomadic" group without dedicated space, and both from the
> > concept of "enclosure". Because it seems to me like Backspace's
> > pragmatic needs are similar to BAPS - to assemble in spaces and occupy
> > them for a finite period, for classes and 1-on-1 sessions. So what are
> > the ways we can frame this as a collaboration rather than a
> > competition?
> >
> > I think these problems would get solved a lot faster if we were all
> > able to trust each other, the best path to building trust is for
> > Backspace to begin operating at the Omni ASAP, and the best way for
> > that to happen is to show support and forgiveness all around. Thanks.
>



-- 


Let us be together,
Let us eat together,
Let us be vital together,
Let us be radiating truth,
radiating the light of life,
Never shall we denounce anyone,
never entertain negativity.                                          -- The
Upanishads
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20141020/0453d53d/attachment.html>