It is a matter of trying to create a structure for an organization where there aren't people covering most of the technical and administrative decision-making effecting who can and who cannot speak - while being a member of the Board. Especially since we're trying out an experiment in governance with more horizontal participation and distributed stakes of ownership.

On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Eddan Katz <eddan@sudoroom.tv> wrote:

Sorry I had to leave the meeting early - I missed some of the things that came up after I left. Just noticed in the minutes the IRC owner announcement. I'm not on IRC much so I haven't followed the moderation control developments since they'd been discussed earlier on. I don't remember what we agreed on, but I do remember there being preference for a distributed moderation solution.

- Can someone explain to me what it means that Marc should be 'the sole founder of the IRC channel'?

4.5 extra bizness consensus motion: marc juul should be the sole founder of our irc channel. 8 unanimous votes yes. 0 abstaining or voting nay. 5. After- Meeting Teamups

Does this role also include final veto decision-making power over bans and blocks on IRC?
Just trying to figure out what situations regarding the Board might pose conflict of interest issues before they come up rather than after.

sent from eddan.com

On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Max Klein <isalix@gmail.com> wrote:

If you remember after last week's meeting we were anxious because we were $800 behind on rent. Now we have $5500 and are officially a Public Benefit Nonprofit Corporation.
Let us take a moment to meditate on this week and the efforts of our members.
Minutes: https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2013-11-06
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss