Difference between revisions of "Sudo room/Governance Structure"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(creates page) |
(adjusts list items) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''This is a DRAFT that requires major INPUT''' | '''This is a DRAFT that requires major INPUT''' | ||
Premise: A decision needs to be made. | *Premise: A decision needs to be made. | ||
Step 1: Discuss at large in the group (with a time limit, and/or feedback can be gathered online instead of taking in-person meeting time) | *Step 1: Discuss at large in the group (with a time limit, and/or feedback can be gathered online instead of taking in-person meeting time) | ||
Step 2: A Council takes this "raw material" and generates a proposal | *Step 2: A Council takes this "raw material" and generates a proposal | ||
Step 3: The Council puts the proposal to the group for amendments & voting. We can do majority vote or total consensus. If the vote is a "no", the Council goes back and drafts another proposal. | *Step 3: The Council puts the proposal to the group for amendments & voting. We can do majority vote or total consensus. If the vote is a "no", the Council goes back and drafts another proposal. | ||
End Result: A decision is made | *End Result: A decision is made | ||
Note A: The "Council" could be comprised of elected representatives (or volunteers, or super-volunteers). TBD. | *Note A: The "Council" could be comprised of elected representatives (or volunteers, or super-volunteers). TBD. | ||
Note B: I'm seeing that the tool of "blocking" can be used in consensus voting, but some groups think of it more as a nuclear option (hence the opportunity to offer amendments and give feedback). This is something else for us to figure out. | *Note B: I'm seeing that the tool of "blocking" can be used in consensus voting, but some groups think of it more as a nuclear option (hence the opportunity to offer amendments and give feedback). This is something else for us to figure out. | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
Revision as of 21:58, 28 June 2012
This is a DRAFT that requires major INPUT
- Premise: A decision needs to be made.
- Step 1: Discuss at large in the group (with a time limit, and/or feedback can be gathered online instead of taking in-person meeting time)
- Step 2: A Council takes this "raw material" and generates a proposal
- Step 3: The Council puts the proposal to the group for amendments & voting. We can do majority vote or total consensus. If the vote is a "no", the Council goes back and drafts another proposal.
- End Result: A decision is made
- Note A: The "Council" could be comprised of elected representatives (or volunteers, or super-volunteers). TBD.
- Note B: I'm seeing that the tool of "blocking" can be used in consensus voting, but some groups think of it more as a nuclear option (hence the opportunity to offer amendments and give feedback). This is something else for us to figure out.
Resources
Research, background investigations, early ideas can go (and come from) here: