Difference between revisions of "Articles of Association/Membership"

Revoked 2 unpopular proposal, added addendum to 4th proposal
(Added membership discussion)
 
(Revoked 2 unpopular proposal, added addendum to 4th proposal)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Proposal:=
=Proposal:=
*That membership requires a minimum fee of $10 per month. (See [https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association/Minimum_Dues Hol's proposal up for consensus)
*That membership requires a minimum fee of $10 per month. (See [https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association/Minimum_Dues Hol's proposal up for consensus)
*That membership does not automatically include the ability to vote.
*That after 1 month of membership a member can show up to a meeting and the community decides by consensus whether the person should become a voting member.
*That membership includes 24/7 access to the space with a personal access code and/or rfid.
*That membership includes 24/7 access to the space with a personal access code and/or rfid.
*That members don't ever have to show up in person if they don't want voting rights.
*That members don't ever have to show up in person if they don't want voting rights.
*That we implement Jake's suggestion for handling non-members. Non-members can use the space as much as they want when other members are present, but cannot access the space when no members are there and have to leave when the last member leaves. To empower members to deal with problematic non-members, non-members can be thrown out at any time by a member if that members feel they are being a problem, _unless_ some other member present in the space is willing to vouch for the member as a guest.
*That we implement Jake's suggestion for handling non-members. Non-members can use the space as much as they want when other members are present, but cannot access the space when no members are there and have to leave when the last member leaves. To empower members to deal with problematic non-members, non-members can be thrown out at any time by a member if that members feel they are being a problem, _unless_ some other member present in the space is willing to vouch for the member as a guest. Non-members being asked to leave must be told that they can further discuss the incident at a Wednesday meeting or on the mailing list.  


=Consensus items=
=Consensus items=
1,196

edits