[sudo-discuss] [omnilogistics] [Critical] Cannot pass new member Rise Above printing

[David Keenan]

Ok so - it's confusing.. i should make a drawing. That's not the Rise Above
proposal -

At worst the Rise Above proposal would require narrowing the part of the
hallway a bit where the fridge and stoves are. Looking at the detail
drawing measurements though, if they are correct, that may not actually be
necessary - Rise Above needs 11' to work in, the narrow part of the room
measures on paper at 13'3". So, that room needs to be measured IRL before
making that drawing.

The only door that would be put in for Rise Above, would be into the
existing doorframe on the west end of the utility room.

Re: the La Commune proposal of closing off the bar-room, the thing is the
proposal unfortunately does not comply with ADA or Fire for the uses and
hours we intend in the building. For the bar-room to be closed off, there
could be no legal public access to the ballroom. The bar-room must be
accessible for the ballroom to be accessible. So that part of the La
Commune proposal is not implementable presently at any rate. Given this I
would not consider that part of their proposal possible. But even if the La
Commune proposal was possible, Rise Above would not be blocking access from
sudo/ccl to the 48th st doors.

Remember the kitchen can't really legally be there. The stuff in the
kitchen is what is choking up that egress more than moving the wall back a
couple feet would (which it is not clear we have to do anyhow.)

Best,
David




On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:

>  from the email you forwarded:
>
>
>
> "I'm so excited to become a part of the Omni collective. In walking
> around the building I've identified an area I think will work well for my
> studio. It is the current utility room and kitchen adjacent to the cafe.
> Since the kitchen will be moved downstairs anyway I figure we can take down
> the non load bearing wall between those two spaces and make it an area big
> enough to house my printing press, heaters, tables and storage."
>
>
>
> there was another proposal on the table for La Commune to block the entire
> entry via the door we normally take to access sudo/ccl after 6pm, with the
> suggested alternative that we have access via the doors at the end of the
> hallway/kitchen onto 48th street.  i don't think splitting access to a
> separate entryway after 6pm is the preferred alternative from hearing
> everyone's input, but if it were there would be a potential conflict
> between that idea and converting the area that is now the kitchen into a
> printshop.
>
>
>
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-08-29 11:47, David Keenan wrote:
>
> Sorry hol.. I know yr probably at work but - what'r ya askin about the
> hallway?
>
> I was just saying, in the detail drawing there is enough room for the
> press, but it doesn't seem to match what I measured in real life - I was
> hoping someone could go check real quick, and maybe measure the width of
> the kitchen-area hallway too.
>
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:39 AM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
>
>>  so nothing in the hallway?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2014-08-29 11:34, David Keenan wrote:
>>
>> Patrik:
>> Since riseup limits attachment size I sent the
>> perhaps-partially-deprecated floorplans for the NW corner and upstairs
>> mezzanine as marked up by our architect for john (since he wanted to be
>> able to approve far in advance.)
>>
>> Hol: Good point..
>>
>> And now actually looking at the detail drawings I see it says 13'3" N-S
>> in the 'ice room' (aka utility room, aka garbage room.) That would be
>> enough room for Gabriela's press with no modification to walls. But. I feel
>> like when we or Gabriela measured it in person (I can't remember who did
>> so), it was definitely less (why I proposed the pony wall be moved back).
>>
>> Can someone actually go re-measure the width of this room, from 48th st
>> side, to the hallway wall, so we know what it is?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:19 AM, <hol at gaskill.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  it would be good to see a drawing of the area being proposed since
>>> there seems to be some confusion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-29 11:12, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:01 AM, David Keenan <dkeenan44 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> What should happen is our earlier-discussed (and approved by john, if
>>>> we want to do it) floorplan of putting doors into the north sides of both
>>>> the storage rooms to provide further means of egress from CCL.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If there is a floorplan already approved with John, please share it -
>>> because I have not seen anything on paper, and I don't think that what you
>>> have in mind is the same as what I've been talking about!
>>>
>>>
>>>>  With this in mind, I think the NE room would be a better room for
>>>> CCL's lab, if that is an option for you guys? It is a bigger room, and
>>>> putting a doorway in the storage room closer to the hallway would allow
>>>> essentially a straight shot through to the double-doors on 48th - Such
>>>> access could be really useful for example to bring a scissor lift into
>>>> Sudo/CCL so it does not have to make turns, as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What I have been suggesting is to route the exit through the small room
>>> in between the two storage rooms. That would indeed be a straight shot, and
>>> would not affect either storage room. But we would need somebody to check
>>> whether the doorway width we can achieve there would be up to code.
>>>
>>> Patrik
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing listsudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.orghttps://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20140829/4cc97553/attachment.html>