[sudo-discuss] Omni Commons Delegates for the Sudo Room

[Rachel Wolfsohn]

I would be wary, sudo, of how few people it already takes to have quorum,
and if that changes...
A small clique of friends can be at a meeting, and make decisions for all
of sudo.
It's a broken system.

Our leaders can either say
"there's the power, don't give it to anyone, let's split it consciously"
 or
 "where's the power? i don't see it"
the latter is falsity in my opinion, it deters you from taking any
the former is truth.


I think 1-vote-per-member; remotely solicited when live-vote isn't
possible, is a much sounder way of representing the opinions and needs of
many people.

to my eyes, consensus seems to be closer to high school social dynamics
than a step in political evolution. i'm definitely disillusioned about
consensus after seeing this project.




On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, danarauz at gmail.com <danarauz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> :)
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My question is whose idea was this in the first place?
>>>
>>
>> It was this guy:
>>
>>   http://i.imgur.com/qmPKJHh.gif
>>
>> --
>> marc/juul
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss at lists.sudoroom.org
>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>


-- 
<3 Rachel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150515/08f27673/attachment.html>