[sudo-discuss] johnny ban / process?

[Johnny]

that link says if "someone's safety is at risk, a temporary ban may be
placed".  it says nothing about how, and obviously is meant to deal with
clear present safety issues, not gossip and accusations.

abusing that vague apparatus of the super-system to ban people on mere
claims is totally fascist and supremacist behavior.

defending it is also fascist.

calling out for the record that Marc, Matt, Cere, Sigma, Jeremy are
fascists for consent to abuse system and unjustly override process without
sudo quorum; ya'll better not step on any cracks!



On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Marc Juul <juul at labitat.dk> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Johnny <mostmodernist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>>
>> No quorum you say?  Sub-Section 3.2.2 "Maintaining Safe Space During
>> Conflict Resolution" states that my ban would have had to been ratified
>> online without quorum.
>>
>>
> The sudo room space, being part of Omni, is also subject to all Omni
> rules, including the Omni safer space policy which I linked previously.
>
> --
> marc/juul
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20160720/1e2a16c9/attachment.html>