[sudo-discuss] [omni-consensus] Proposal: Hire or Replace Me as Omni's Bookkeeper

[Jenny Ryan]

Re: Timing - A quick glance at the edit history of the Google Doc I linked
to in my proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pZwwjGPjsCryp78dySTHFbrmiTZR-Q5FqQf82S5eTpk/edit#>
can demonstrate that I've been writing it since last October, knowing I
would need to start generating my household's income this year and acutely
aware of how much time Omni's bookkeeping work has taken in the past. It
should be noted I'm essentially doing the bookkeeping for not one, but 6
collectives (Omni writ large, Sudo, LibLens, partial DIY [they have a
secondary fiscal sponsor as well], The Village [a significant amount of
work], and BAPS [tho they contributed $0 in 2019 and have no expenses]) and
tax season is now upon us.

I am unable to attend the Delegate's Meeting this Thursday as I'll be out
of town, but happy to answer any questions or concerns remotely.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Yardena Cohen <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019, 6:58 AM Steve Martinot <martinot4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ironically, people raise the fact that I haven't responded to this
> thread. But I didn't see any responses or discussion concerning what I
> raised in my last two emails. I guess some people like to have it both ways.
> >
> > The suggestion has been made that I should fulfill certain criteria in
> order to speak (like shoeing up for meetings that I'm not sure will
> actually occur).  If that is the case, then please give me the full list of
> criteria I need to meet in order to speak (when I feel like speaking), with
> the source or foundation for the items on the list. That way, some brave
> soul can tell me to shut the fuck up if I don't fulfill all the terms of
> the list. At least, that is the logic of some of the statements made in
> which my name is bandied about.
>
> Steve, who's telling you not to speak? Quite the opposite, I'm asking
> you to say something substantial about the issue of paying Jenny (or
> somebody else) to do Omni's bookkeeping, which IIRC you still haven't
> done, and which I think should be a bare minimum requirement in a
> consensus process where you're the only person blocking, which appears
> to be the case here.
>
> For the record, the past 3 delegates meetings have had full or nearly
> full quorum.
> _______________________________________________
> consensus mailing list
> consensus at lists.omnicommons.org
> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20190318/a94be8d2/attachment.html>