Difference between revisions of "Network/Reboot"

Network/Reboot (view source)

Revision as of 22:48, 19 June 2014

472 bytes added , 22:48, 19 June 2014

→‎Wishlist (in progress)

Oosomebody

59

edits

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 ===Wishlist (in progress) ===
-Note: This is a 'wish list' that if this becomes a reality I believe will get is with a solid start, network wise.
+Note:
-We are listing two racks, a 2 and 4 post racks. But, because the $ can keep us from getting this a reality, I suggest that we make the effort to get one 4 post rack with square hole. This 4 post rack would be able to handle switches and rack servers as well.--Wiring Scheme to be used: T568B. -Sudo and all Omni Collective members participation is very welcome; ask/answer/suggest/comment/etc.
+If this 'wish list' becomes a reality will get us with a solid backbone network; for a good amount of years to come.
+Anyway, We are listing two racks, a 2 and 4 post racks. But, if $ is an issue then I suggest that we make the effort to get one 4 post rack with [http://www.server-racks.com/rack-hole-types.html square holes]. This [http://www.panduit.com/wcs/Satellite?c=Page&childpagename=Panduit_Global%2FPG_Layout&cid=1345565612156&packedargs=item_id%3DR4P%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%26locale%3Den_us&pagename=PG_Wrapper 4 post rack] would be able to handle switches and rack servers as well. Also essential, if chosen to have a CAT6A backbone, connectors, patch panels, cables should be CAT6A. Otherwise if one of those items is CAT5 or CAT5e, then the network will go for the lowest Category available.
+-Wiring Scheme to be used: T568B.
+-Sudo and all Omni Collective members participation is very welcome; ask/answer/suggest/comment/etc.
 '''TOC'''