Difference between revisions of "3D Printed Aerodynamic Parts"

no edit summary
(Created page with " -Nose Cones -Fin Cans")
 
Line 1: Line 1:


-Nose Cones
For me, the advantage of 3-D printed model rocket parts is the ability to create a very thin and structurally efficient shape without concern over fabrication and the relative alignments of subparts.  Components can be printed true to final form (+/-) with only light treatment required to smooth outer surfaces so long as the basic restrictions of the manufacturing method are understood.




-Fin Cans
 
'''Nose Cones'''
 
Several prototypes have been created in both 29mm and 65mm diameter, using a tangent-ogive profile.
TO DO: write code to generate g-code directly instead of using SolidWorks and Slic3r.
WHY: avoid 15 min + delay time using slicer, better match to theoretical shape without.
 
TO DO: Model payload supports integral with structural elements.
WHY: Reduce number of fasteners and/or adhesive required.
 
 
'''Fin Cans'''
 
One prototype printed, downrated to smaller engine size until proven.  Will mount adapter to aft bulkhead using (4) #4-40 screws.
Anonymous user