[sudo-discuss] ian moon banned

[Robb Anonymous]

should prolly have started a new thread for this

do the becoming omni facilitators plan to make it clear to the participants
that the collectives' delegates will have to get approval from their
collectives in order for any substantial change to take place on the ground
at the omni? how do they plan on informing the collectives' members who do
not attend as to the progress of the process?
thx
~r

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:10 PM, yar <yardenack at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:34 PM, niki <niki.shelley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's my understanding that this process could potentially result in a
> more
> > top-down restructuring of the management of the Omni with little to no
> > required buy-in from the individual collectives.
>
> Just to be very clear, this is an open-ended process where nothing is
> pre-ordained, which will depend entirely on who shows up and what they
> want. If people show up wanting to turn Omni into a Kafkaesque
> dystopia, then yes, that could "potentially" be the result. But I
> doubt it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/attachments/20150827/5c37e6b5/attachment.html>