Difference between revisions of "Meeting Notes 2023-09-06"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting Notes 2023-09-06 (view source)

Revision as of 21:49, 6 September 2023

1,256 bytes removed ,  21:49, 6 September 2023
m
→‎Membership
(Created page with "= Attendees = Andy, Ian, Paige, Jonathan, Kent, Jake, Muiren = Agenda = * temescal brewing event * Reimagining the new member process == Membership == * Andy: membership process needs to be less confusing / less of an obstacle. New name for membership more like "authorized user." Hey everyone! This is all great insights, and I want to remind everyone we have a meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, September 5th) at 8 PM if people want to chat about some of this in person. My...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
== Membership ==
== Membership ==
* Andy: membership process needs to be less confusing / less of an obstacle. New name for membership more like "authorized user."
* Andy: membership process needs to be less confusing / less of an obstacle. New name for membership more like "authorized user."
Hey everyone! This is all great insights, and I want to remind everyone we have a meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, September 5th) at 8 PM if people want to chat about some of this in person.
My personal opinion is that we should change the terms we use. What we currently call "Members" should be called "admins" or something that better describes highly involved members engaged in managing the space. And I think we should apply the term "members" to anyone who walks in the door and wants to feel a sense of belonging. Basically, if you agree to adhere to the code of conduct and sign up for the malinglist, you're now a "member".
> we should apply the term "members" to anyone who walks in the door and wants to feel a sense of belonging.
Love it. Ironically this reminds me of the way sudo used to be, before
incorporating or formalizing any process or moving to omni. Except
there were always stark inequities in who felt comfortable actually
declaring a person's membership to exist. I hope we can do better this
time around.
This also begs the question of whether or how we keep track of
membership - should there be a centralized list or not? Is sudo-humans
appropriate or up to the task? Either way, sudo-humans would need to
be changed.


Do we need a member list
Do we need a member list
Line 35: Line 18:


* Andy: useful to boil this down, what are the problems,  
* Andy: useful to boil this down, what are the problems,  
* Jonathan: primary goal - getting new people to feel comfortable using the space. Right now current membership is a lot for people. Also not clear to some  
* Jonathan: primary goal - getting new people to feel comfortable using the space. Right now current membership is a lot for people. Also not clear to some people that they are able to participate even while endorsement process takes place
===== people that they are able to participate even while endorsement process takes place
two tiers - member
two tiers - member
idea of a sponsoring member. Responsibility to do monthly donation, and get ability to vote in meetings and cardkey access
idea of a sponsoring member. Responsibility to do monthly donation, and get ability to vote in meetings and cardkey access
Paigep
152

edits

Retrieved from "https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/12260...12262"

Navigation menu