335
edits
Difference between revisions of "Membermatters"
no edit summary
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* we should look for ways to find out why the emails are rejected by some servers | * we should look for ways to find out why the emails are rejected by some servers | ||
* we probably need to format the emails with plaintext and MIME to make them look normal to spam checkers | * we probably need to format the emails with plaintext and MIME to make them look normal to spam checkers | ||
* Our server is postfix based, but yeah, postfix has very good logging on exactly what happens to each message. Though you as the sender can't know if it went into spam, only if it got outright rejected. | |||
* emails to an MIT address were rejected by Microsoft: "Access denied, banned sending IP [198.199.116.180]. To request removal from this list please visit https://sender.office.com/ and follow the directions" and then Sean followed the directions and asked them to unblock our IP address | |||
* we need to setup monitoring of emails that were outright rejected, and take action each time. Dealing with emails marked as spam will be more challenging unless people have access to the spam filter information on their receiving end. | |||
* we need to encourage more and people to sign up to the new system as we make progress, AFTER setting up rejection monitoring | |||
= certbot = | = certbot = | ||
* juul used pipx to install, and then had to manually make a systemd job to check it twice a day | * juul used pipx to install, and then had to manually make a systemd job to check it twice a day | ||