Difference between revisions of "Sudo room/Governance Structure"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
adjusts list items
(creates page)
 
(adjusts list items)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''This is a DRAFT that requires major INPUT'''
'''This is a DRAFT that requires major INPUT'''


Premise: A decision needs to be made.
*Premise: A decision needs to be made.
Step 1: Discuss at large in the group (with a time limit, and/or feedback can be gathered online instead of taking in-person meeting time)
*Step 1: Discuss at large in the group (with a time limit, and/or feedback can be gathered online instead of taking in-person meeting time)
Step 2: A Council takes this "raw material" and generates a proposal
*Step 2: A Council takes this "raw material" and generates a proposal
Step 3: The Council puts the proposal to the group for amendments & voting. We can do majority vote or total consensus. If the vote is a "no", the Council goes back and drafts another proposal.
*Step 3: The Council puts the proposal to the group for amendments & voting. We can do majority vote or total consensus. If the vote is a "no", the Council goes back and drafts another proposal.
End Result: A decision is made
*End Result: A decision is made


Note A: The "Council" could be comprised of elected representatives (or volunteers, or super-volunteers). TBD.
*Note A: The "Council" could be comprised of elected representatives (or volunteers, or super-volunteers). TBD.
Note B: I'm seeing that the tool of "blocking" can be used in consensus voting, but some groups think of it more as a nuclear option (hence the opportunity to offer amendments and give feedback). This is something else for us to figure out.  
*Note B: I'm seeing that the tool of "blocking" can be used in consensus voting, but some groups think of it more as a nuclear option (hence the opportunity to offer amendments and give feedback). This is something else for us to figure out.  


==Resources==
==Resources==
Anonymous user

Navigation menu