Difference between revisions of "Mesh/Firmware/Splash page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mesh/Firmware/Splash page (view source)
Revision as of 19:37, 29 October 2013
, 19:37, 29 October 2013→Current in-progress solution for iOS
| Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
::The clients will get an IP that is on the mesh subnet and will be able to communicate with the entire mesh and internet. They will get different IPs depending on which dhcp server / internet gateway that is "closer" to them when their lease is up. This is how it's done in batman-adv. [[User:Juul|Juul]] ([[User talk:Juul|talk]]) | ::The clients will get an IP that is on the mesh subnet and will be able to communicate with the entire mesh and internet. They will get different IPs depending on which dhcp server / internet gateway that is "closer" to them when their lease is up. This is how it's done in batman-adv. [[User:Juul|Juul]] ([[User talk:Juul|talk]]) | ||
:::This is done in batman-adv if you have different topology. If you have VPN tunnels you might do it differently. The issue is that you might not want to have multiple gateways in the network anyway. [[User:Mitar|Mitar]] ([[User talk:Mitar|talk]]) 15:42, 3 September 2013 (PDT) | :::This is done in batman-adv if you have different topology. If you have VPN tunnels you might do it differently. The issue is that you might not want to have multiple gateways in the network anyway. [[User:Mitar|Mitar]] ([[User talk:Mitar|talk]]) 15:42, 3 September 2013 (PDT) | ||
::::Yes we could run a central DHCP server, but that would make the mesh less resilient to segmentation. We are trying to make something that has as little centralization as possible. I'm interested in why we would not want multiple gateways though? ([[Special:Contributions/46.4.202.3|46.4.202.3]] 20:37, 29 October 2013 (PDT)) | |||
== Proxy == | == Proxy == | ||