I have always viewed things much as you are presenting
them now. Even
though I flew Marcin out here to give a talk and put him up in my apt. a
few years ago, I never thought OSE would be a monolithic effort but more of
an agenda to spark widespread development along many lines by many
different groups with different backgrounds and approaches towards a
clearly-articulated common goal.
And, I am personally more interested in directly working on a simple,
efficient, safe, performant vehicle I can drive around in every day than a
tractor or CEB press which I will probably not use for the next 5-10 years
if ever. And I am interested in Ivan Illich's and Tony Foale's visions for
what such a vehicle should be like.
Windmills might be cool too if we can focus on a design that is both
simple to build and useful and of high quality once built.
I also agree that we should be able to have more than one project going at
once.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Morten H. D. Fuglsang <vallebo(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
*Gmail came prematurely. To continue:*
Now seems like a good time to consider what we are doing and why we do it.
I talked with Tom, Mark and Jehan briefly about our state of affairs and
current direction. It made me realize that:
* Most of us are excited about metalwork and building a big machine. Most
of us are not specifically excited about the CEB press.
* I hate giving up on things, and this gives me energy for continuing and
finishing the CEB press regardless of findings about the state of OSE.
* I am also open for defining another thing to build (ie. small-scale
windmills), that might be more immidiately useful for ourselves and our
communities in an urban environment.
* Maybe those two work-foci are not mutually exclusive.
What are your thoughts?
*ALSO: OMI is of course on this Saturday from noon.*
I won't be making it as I will be hacking Marin.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Morten H. D. Fuglsang <vallebo(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Hol, awesome! We definitely need more expertise in the area of
> hydraulics. And good links too, thanks to both of ye.
>
> I was lurking the OSE forums a bit the other day. I found something that
> scared me a bit:
>
http://forum.opensourceecology.org/discussion/1004/why-is-ose-so-quiet-late…
> Some quotes:
>
> *Yoonseo, OSE team*
> *Just want to clear things up with the facts about what's happening
> with OSE. First and foremost, everyone on-site left OSE after the huge
> conflict year-end 2012 between the team and Marcin.*
> *
> *
>
> *
> Brianna, OSE team
> *
>
> *
> Lies about the quality of the products. The brick press produced shit
> for bricks. They didn't have one flat surface on them. I personally built 4
> of these, which were all shipped out without proper testing. One was
> shipped out a year after it was supposed to be. The power cube worked for a
> week AT THE LONGEST
>
> *
>
> *
> Ryan, random dude.
> *
>
> *
> I have a collective of makers that just received a space grant in
> upstate NY that are making a list of first projects to focus on, and the
> OSE Liberator and CEB press are near the top of the list. Hearing that the
> Powercube design doesn't hold up to use and the CEB press being almost
> useless scare the heck out of us though. Does anyone on here know who
> purchased these preorders, or anyone that is using actively any iterations
> of these pieces? I'd love to hear about their experiences.
>
> *
>
> *
> Yoonseo, OSE team:
> Hey Ryan, it's actually not so bad. OSE has been doing subpar builds
> primarily due to haste and lack of care from Marcin, but the general
> mechanisms (at least for the ceb press and powercube) are sound- we
> couldn't have done the hablab/workshop without it. To be clear- the CEB
> Press and Powercube work. Now the only issue is that you have to use good
> materials and produce them properly (instead of the bad stuff that broke on
> us over and over).
>
> The inexpensive surplus engines for the Powercube have frequently caused
> problems due to breaking magnetos; a bunch of the solenoids broke too.
> Shoddy commercial parts! So on the powercube side, as long as you get
> engines with reliable accessories, and long-life solenoids, everything
> should be fine. Remember to seal the threaded hydraulic connections and
> tighten sufficiently- hydraulic leaks are bad! Also, I think the most
> difficult part of the powercube production for you will be sealing and
> installing the ports on the gasoline and hydraulic fluid reservoirs. Make
> sure you get this done right else you'll get gas/hyd fluid leaks all over
> the place. When I was at FeF there's mostly been problems with hydraulic
> fluid leaking due to improperly sealed connections. No explosions though,
> heh.
>
> Now the CEB Press can easily have issues surrounding its compression
> chamber. If you do not use thick enough steel and insufficiently reinforce
> the compression walls, you will get bending and that will get you curved
> bricks. No good. Also the second thing was that the ejection surface must
> be parallel or subsequent surfaces must be scaled in the proper direction.
> Otherwise you will get the bottom of your bricks sliced by about 1/4" as it
> gets ejected. Also make sure that the primary cylinder is high enough so
> that the pressing surface can actually get to the ejection surface
> (otherwise you gonna get some more bottom-slicing action). I think those
> were the major issues. Make sure you put a pressure relief valve on there
> eh.
>
> Hope that helps! -Yoonseo
>
> *
>
>
> My conclusions:
> * I predict OSE wont last much longer, and will ta some point stop being
> the center of a lot of this open hardware infrastructure stuff. Groups will
> fork it and improve upon the designs.
> * hence thre is no need for us to associate ourselves closely with and
> limit ourselves by, OSE. In terms of how we build and what we build.
> Instead, it makes more sense for me to think of us as forking OSE.
> * The CEB press can work if we use common sense and confirm the design
> and do it very properly. If not, it wont work as well. We should not trust
> the OSE plans and recommendations too much.
>
>
>
>
> Make a great day,
> Morten H. D. Fuglsang
> US: +1 415 799 6931 // skype: FlyvendeHest
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco(a)gmail.com
>
wrote:
>
>> See also
https://www.surpluscenter.com/hydraulic.asp?catname=hydraulicfor all
your cheapness in hydraulics needs.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Hol Gaskill <hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I haven't been around much for fabrication of the frame and probably
>>> won't be there on saturday build days at least until mid june, but I
would
>>> like to help with the implementation of the hydraulics system. All the
>>> designs I've seen are centered around the powercube which is powered by
a
>>> briggs and stratton engine. For simplicity and flexibility, I propose
>>> using an electric pump either 12VDC or 120VAC, or a standard mount and
>>> coupler so we could swap them out. It could still be powered by a
>>> generator for remote applications, or ideally from solar/batteries. I just
>>> see the OSE powercube as being a little more complex than we might prefer
>>> moving forward, and we can still get the same force even if we go to a
>>> lower power pump, the machine would just operate more slowly.
>>>
>>>
>>> power unit:
>>>
>>>
http://www.zorotools.com/g/00034368/k-G0711252?utm_source=google_shopping&a…
>>>
>>> valve example (just a cheap one...not researched)
>>>
http://www.coastpneumatics.com/valve-3quarter.html
>>>
>>> does anyone know the force/pressure we need for the rams?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> hol
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> omi mailing list
>>> omi(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/omi
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> omi mailing list
>> omi(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/omi
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
omi mailing list
omi(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/omi