Difference between revisions of "Mesh/Firmware/Splash page"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
adds alternatives section
m
(adds alternatives section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


Currently this page talks mostly about how to implement the fake captive portal.
Currently this page talks mostly about how to implement the fake captive portal.
= Alternative Options =
After some thought and investigation, there some alternative options that build off the proposed actions above and the research in the sections following. Instead of listening for captive portal requests and then responding with a fake captive portal, we do a few different things. First, let's consider the use case:
<blockquote>Ideally, we want new users to know what this network is about.</blockquote>
Running a default captive portal is simply not an option. It impedes usage of the network. However, what if there was an unobtrusive way to display a message to users that did not require using the crappy captive portal mechanism, or a complicated match on special captive portal probes.


= Types of captive portal detection =
= Types of captive portal detection =
Line 214: Line 222:
:Will not clients have global IPs for whole mesh? ([[User:Mitar|Mitar]])
:Will not clients have global IPs for whole mesh? ([[User:Mitar|Mitar]])
::The clients will get an IP that is on the mesh subnet and will be able to communicate with the entire mesh and internet. They will get different IPs depending on which dhcp server / internet gateway that is "closer" to them when their lease is up. This is how it's done in batman-adv. [[User:Juul|Juul]] ([[User talk:Juul|talk]])
::The clients will get an IP that is on the mesh subnet and will be able to communicate with the entire mesh and internet. They will get different IPs depending on which dhcp server / internet gateway that is "closer" to them when their lease is up. This is how it's done in batman-adv. [[User:Juul|Juul]] ([[User talk:Juul|talk]])
:::This is done in batman-adv if you have different topology. If you have VPN tunnels you might do it differently. The issue is that you might not want to have multiple gateways in the network anyway. [[User:Mitar|Mitar]] ([[User talk:Mitar|talk]]) 15:42, 3 September 2013 (PDT)
::::Yes we could run a central DHCP server, but that would make the mesh less resilient to segmentation. We are trying to make something that has as little centralization as possible. I'm interested in why we would not want multiple gateways though? ([[Special:Contributions/46.4.202.3|46.4.202.3]] 20:37, 29 October 2013 (PDT))


== Proxy ==
== Proxy ==

Navigation menu