I know that for people who built sudomesh and have been working on the
project this whole time, but who don't have time or availability to host
meetings or onboard new people, this may read as unwanted pressure, but I
agree with the principle of the idea.
There are a lot of people who want to see sudomesh and its projects prosper,
and effectively rejecting new energy and leaving it to people outside the
project to handle requests for more information is not a good way to do
things.
Can we just discuss what the options are together and try to move forward
somehow?
-jake
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Andrew R Gross wrote:
Hey, two new guys came by tonight and expressed strong
interest in
Sudo-Mesh. I told them to come around on Tuesday and get to know people.
I want to reiterate that I think the current posture of legacy members of
this project is unproductive and demoralizing, because all requests to join
are ignored, but any attempts to independently create a fork of the project
are condemned. I once again think that one of the legacy members should
agree to either hold an open event or agree to let others meet and talk
about Sudo Mesh in their absence. But I will refrain from any further
mischief out of respect for the wishes of the legacy members of this
project.
Cheers,
*Andrew R Gross, (he/him)*
412.657.5332 -
shrad.org <http://www.shrad.org>