Adrian Chadd, who is on the sudomesh mailing list, is the one who I believe
implemented TDMA in FreeBSD. We've been pestering him about if for a little
while now, but if you want to add to the chorus I'm sure it couldn't hurt...
After Defcon, of course ;)
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Mitar <mitar(a)tnode.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Have you made a ticket for this TDMA support?
>
> But I think it would be better if this could get into an OpenWrt itself.
> It would be easier for us to use it then.
>
>
> Mitar
>
> > After some more research I found that FreeBSD recently added TDMA
> > support to their ath driver [1].
> > Friend of mine just tried to use it on some cheap TP-Link device but
> > currently TDMA support is broken but it will be fixed in next few
> > days.
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath%284%29
> >
>
> --
> http://mitar.tnode.com/
> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
>
> Settings and unsubscription:
> https://wlan-si.net/lists/info/development
>
> Public archive:
> https://wlan-si.net/lists/arc/development
>
Maximum two per customer.
This is not quite as good as our recommended TP-Link N600 (internal instead
of external antennas) but it's $10 instead of $40 sooo...
Actually if a few people are willing to buy the maximum two per customer
the mesh will buy them from you.
--
marc/juul
Hi!
>From Battlemesh V8 agenda (http://battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV8/Agenda):
The new FCC rules are in effect in the United States from June 2nd 2015
[1] for WiFi devices such as Access Points. They require to have the
firmware locked down so End-Users can't operate with non-compliant
parameters (channels/frequencies, transmit power, DFS, ...). In
response, WiFi access point vendors start to lock down firmwares to
prevent custom firmwares (such as OpenWRT) to be installed, using code
signing, etc. Since the same type of devices are often sold world wide,
this change does not only affect routers in the US, but also Europe, and
this will also effect wireless communities.
We would like to discuss:
* What are your experiences with recently certified WiFi Hardware
* How can we still keep OpenWRT on these devices
* What can we suggest to Hardware vendors so that they keep their
firmware open for community projects while still compliant with the FCC?
[1]
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?id=39498&switc…
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/https://twitter.com/mitar_m
sorry for the list email, not sure who to cotnsct.
Wanted to check out the new members intro tonight, but addressed door is
locked. Will try my luck back here..
The 3750 is gige.
The 3550 may be 10/100, but you do get to do decent L3 functions +
VLAN stuff on it, so it's not a complete loss.
-adrian
On 24 July 2015 at 15:55, Ronald Cotoni <setient(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> For Noisebridge, those switches use a lot of power, are not gigabit and we
> just recently put in some nice fancy equipment. We also have a stack of
> other cisco gear that we do not use. I am not quite sure where we could use
> them except by taking them apart for components, maybe. If you have that
> many, it might be nice to start a Cisco class at noisebridge or Sudoroom and
> setup all sorts of fun things.
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24 July 2015 at 12:53, danarauz(a)gmail.com <danarauz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey Adrian, where are you from? Sudo or Noisebridge?
>> > I need to state who will receive them, and also a thank you letter would
>> > be
>> > nice to send.
>>
>> I've shown up to both? :)
>>
>> I think splitting the switches 50/50 between the two groups would work out
>> best.
>>
>>
>>
>> -adrian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss(a)lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
Omitting this person's contact info for privacy, but can share with
anyone interested.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:31 PM
Subject: [sudo-info] from Chelsea Apts in Savannah
To: info(a)sudoroom.org
I stumbled across something on the Net that you may have a bunch of
Meraki Sparky control boards. Any interest in selling a dozen? We have
a bunch of outdoor Meraki Access Points and when lightning strikes,
they no longer function.
Hellos,
*Good News!*We now have a total of 10 new data drops at the second floor
where the computers for the public are.
Four computers are already setup and ready to use. The other six are
already active, so it is matter of bringing more computers to the table and
set them up.
The second one from the left was not booting up, and since I had a bootable
USB with Debian 8 with me; well.. I installed Debian on it. User name: user
Password: user Root's password: user -Feel free to modify that if one wish
or if it required. I just wanted to have it running at least.
I removed all the extra unnecessary and/or unsafe equipment that was there
on that table.
Excuse me that it was brought down to one of the tables at Sudo, but I was
too exhausted that I just wanted to go home.
*ALERTS:*
DNS: At the time that I left the building, 5pm, there were some DNS issues.
DNS was not resolving.
Pinging Google's DNS IP 8.8.8.8 worked, but not when trying the domain
name. The issue seemed intermittent.
BANDWIDTH: Also, I ran a few speed tests and they area about 20Mbps /
1.5Mbps.
Thanks Hassan, Sierk, and Francisco for your help during these three days
of work.
Daniel
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!
https://omnicommons.org/donate
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Usually I think of cloud-based services as necessarily antithetical to user
data privacy, but telegram doesn't seem to think so. They claim to be very
interested in privacy (read here:
https://telegram.org/faq#q-what-are-your-thoughts-on-internet-privacy) and
also not to currently be or ever become motivated by profit, but they store
most of your data (encrypted) on their own servers for convenience (easy
access, search-ability, etc.)
Is user data safe with promises like these? Is the threat of legal action
enough to guarantee that an organization like Telegram is indeed practicing
what it claims to be practicing?
https://telegram.org/privacy
--Benny
p.s. Either way, it's nice to see user privacy get so much attention.
Hello Sudoers and Noisebridgers,
There are about six Cisco switches that I have been asked if we are
interested on getting as donation.
The model I can read off the attached photo is:
4- Cisco Catalyst 3750 24 Ports - 2x1G SFP (transceivers not included)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/hardware/qui…
The others 2 that I think may be:
1- Cisco Catalyst 3550 24 Ports - 2x1G SFP (fiber transceivers not included)
1- Cisco Catalyst 2850 24 Ports - 2x1G (fiber transceivers not included)
If interested please let me know ASAP, since I have to reply to the person
offering this items.
He has been waiting for three weeks or so; for us to answer. He emailed me
today again.
Thanks,
Daniel A.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!
https://omnicommons.org/donate
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Anyone seen this?
“*The Next Generation Connectivity Handbook: a Guide for Community Leaders
Seeking Affordable Abundant Bandwidth.*”
http://www.gig-u.org/NextGenConnectivity
--
marc/juul
