8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
2:45 p.m.
Hi!
I think our mesh networks should be an uProxy endpoints as well. So that
people outside the mesh networks could easily get into them.
http://www.uproxy.org/
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
6:11 p.m.
Hi!
Yes. I think what I am thinking here is just that our networks should
support different other projects and different ways people want to
protect themselves. So if for somebody using a uProxy extension is
something they know how to do, let's support that.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
7:37 p.m.
On 1/13/2014 8:11 PM, Mitar wrote:
Sure. No doubt. I'm just trying to see how uProxy would fit in. Would
the mesh run multiple uProxy entrance nodes? Would people use uProxy on
the mesh and advertise mesh routes? I wasn't quite sure how it would fit
in to the mesh. Would folks be dual homed to uProxy and mesh?
So if for somebody using a uProxy extension is
something they know how to do, let's support that.
Yeah. Totally agree. It's pretty cool software. I'm just not seeing how
we as mesh net builders can go about doing that. Would you be able to
write up a short overview of what that would look like?
4184
days inactive
4190
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Charles N. Wyble -
Mitar