Sorry for not showing up for a time, I have this awful cold. This must
be at least the 4th this season, what the hell is going on?
Anyway, I'll be back as soon as I can shake it. See you there.
--
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign:
http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html
Yes dhcp now. Each node is assigned a /26 at birth by makenode. It uses the
first ip for itself and the next four for extender nodes then hands out the
rest to clients on short leases. If we want ipv6 then we could get the
nodes to self-assign a random small subnet within a specified larger
subnet. We will then want to use dhcpv6 to hand out ips to clients for a
few reasons but a big one is that most operating systems embed their MAC
address in their self-assigned ipv6 address which would turn …
[View More]the mesh into
a huge tracking network just by traceroute'ing continuously to a
predictable set of ips for a know MAC for e.g. someone's phone. Windows is
the only major OS that "does it right" and uses the alternate strategy for
ipv6 self-assignment which was added to the standars later, namely
"randomly generate". Linux folks are being stubborn and want to stick to
the default that is specified in the standars as the default. This is
terrible for privacy. Using dhcpv6 means we can ensure that client MAC
addresses are not embedded in assigned IPs
On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Oops, yea not link local, but random. How do client devices get ipv4
> addresses now? Not dhcp, right?
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Mitar <mitar(a)tnode.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mitar(a)tnode.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Ah, for nodes. Yes, nodes could have automatic IPv6 addresses (and not
>> even link-local, but global).
>>
>> For clients is trickier.
>>
>> But we could do some automatic IPv6 address subnets for nodes. :-)
>>
>>
>> Mitar
>>
>> > Well, I'm not an expert on all the details, but I imagine we'd generate
>> > them randomly during makenode (or whenever). Then routes to addresses
>> would
>> > be propagated by babel in the same way that ipv4 addresses are now. I'm
>> not
>> > sure if the exit server would need an ipv6 address or if it would be
>> good
>> > to switch existing nodes over.
>> >
>> > -Jehan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Mitar <mitar(a)tnode.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mitar(a)tnode.com');>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> I was asking for the "IPv6 randomly generated link-local
>> >> addresses" idea. How would that route?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Mitar
>> >>
>> >>>> And how would you route that over L3 network?
>> >>>
>> >>> Off the top of my head:
>> >>>
>> >>> - Packet headed somewhere on the internet with an ipv4 address comes
>> >> from a
>> >>> client device to the home node.
>> >>> - Home node pops that packet into an ipv6 packet bearing the ipv6
>> address
>> >>> of the exit server which is then routed over the mesh network
>> >>> - Exit server takes the ipv4 packet out and does NAT on it (switches
>> the
>> >>> source address to public IP) and sends it out to the internet.
>> >>> - Response from internet comes back to exit server, the exit server
>> does
>> >>> NAT again (switches the destination address to private IP)
>> >>> - Exit server puts the packet into an ipv6 packet with the ipv6
>> address
>> >> of
>> >>> the home node and sends it onto the mesh (it needs to have kept track
>> of
>> >>> the ipv6 address)
>> >>> - Home node receives the ipv6 packet, takes the ipv4 packet out and
>> sends
>> >>> it to the client.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not an expert, so there might be some issues with this. Here's an
>> RFC
>> >>> which might be similar:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7040
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Marc Juul <juul(a)labitat.dk
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','juul(a)labitat.dk');>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Mitar <mitar(a)tnode.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mitar(a)tnode.com');>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> IMO, we should put everything on ipv6 randomly generated link-local
>> >>>>>> addresses to avoid the whole makenode centralized IP assignment
>> >>>>> business.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> And how would you route that over L3 network?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It would work over L2 Batman network. But not over L3.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Have you looked into AHCP:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://www.irif.fr/~jch/software/ahcp/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ssssh! Why did you have to tell them about AHCP?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ... *OBLIVIATE!*
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> marc/juul
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://mitar.tnode.com/
>> >> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> http://mitar.tnode.com/
>> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
>>
>
>
[View Less]
so if this is the case, will home nodes still be able to give out IPV4
addresses or will the mesh exclude equipment which doesn't support IPV6?
-jake
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 Jehan wrote:
> So let me get this straight- home nodes advertise their /26, which is how
> the network knows how to get return traffic back to any given client?
>
> Wouldn't giving clients ipv6 addresses result in the problems with many of
> the ipv4 only protocols that were mentioned at the start of the thread?…
[View More]
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Mitar <mitar(a)tnode.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Windows is the only major OS that "does it right" and uses the
>>> alternate strategy for ipv6 self-assignment which was added to the
>>> standars later, namely "randomly generate".
>>
>> This is called:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3041
>>
>>> Linux folks are being stubborn and want to stick to the default that
>>> is specified in the standars as the default.
>>
>> Seems Ubuntu fixed this in 2011 or 2012:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/176125
>>
>>
>> Mitar
[View Less]
------------------- forwarded message -------------------
My work is tossing about 18 of these Radwin 2000 radios. Does the mesh project
want them? If so I could ask.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
--
Gregg Horton
510-283-8734
gregghorton.com [gregghorton.com]
My work is tossing about 18 of these Radwin 2000 radios. Does the mesh
project want them? If so I could ask.
--
Gregg Horton
510-283-8734
gregghorton.com
Hello Folks,
Just you are on the know.
My friend Mike Wilson (not a Sudoer, but kindly building us the gate at the
server area) has planed to come this Friday to do the wire fencing.
Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions.
Daniel
Signal: 415.336.9143 <https://whispersystems.org/>
WhatsApp: 415.336.9143 <https://www.whatsapp.com/download/>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Help open a people-…
[View More]powered common space in Oakland, California!
https://omnicommons.org/donate
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
[View Less]
Yeah, for the CleaZe I bet we could do above the study room on roof of the east wing or above Ito's lounge on the west.
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mitar" <mitar(a)tnode.com>
To: "Jehan Tremback" <jehan.tremback(a)gmail.com>, "Marc Juul" <juul(a)labitat.dk>
Cc: "mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org" <mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org>
Subject: [Mesh] Source of gigabits
Date: Wed, Apr 26, 2017 7:37 PM
Hi!
Maybe instead of Cloyne try CZ (Casa Zimbabwe). Last time I checked
quite a …
[View More]bit of Berkeley and large Oakland buildings were visible from
there. And we have then internal WiFi links from CZ to Cloyne and other
houses.
There are also some photos from roofs if it helps.
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0Bz0lCyRxvUUTflpZSTBYY2UwVUR0ODV…
Mitar
> I was poking around on Google Earth, and getting to Cloyne seems pretty
> dicey, even from the lowest altitude that google earth can go which was
> probably ~20 feet above the LMI roof. It's in a somewhat low lying and
> heavily vegetated area.
>
> -Jehan
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Marc Juul <juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
>
>> We may have an opportunity to get affordable gigabits from LMI.
>>
>> They may allows us to put an AirFiber node on their roof. I haven't gotten
>> the quote yet but I'm expecting it to be around $1000 per month +/- 50%.
>>
>> We'd need somewhere with line of sight to the LMI rooftop where we can
>> mount a few rooftop node.
>>
>> Does anyone on this list live near this address or know someone who does?
>>
>> One obvious peer would be one of the Berkeley Student Coops, e.g. Cloyne.
>>
>> Can someone use e.g. Google Earth to check line of sight from the LMI roof
>> to the surrounding student coops?
>>
>> The LMI address is:
>>
>> 1700 Martin Luther King Jr Way
>> Berkeley, CA 94709
>>
>> --
>> marc/juul
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesh mailing list
>> mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>> https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/mesh
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesh mailing list
> mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/mesh
>
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/https://twitter.com/mitar_m
_______________________________________________
mesh mailing list
mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/mesh
[View Less]
I've been reading this:
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=B96257CF84CE1CBD7D1E544B431F74E5
and while that book is a lot less to the point than I'd like, it got me
thinking about how the internet is structured in the bay area with regards
to stakeholders, their relationships and their physical connections.
I would like to begin an effort to map this out on our wiki. Who's
interested in helping out?
Here are some of my questions:
Exactly who owns the fiber?
How much do those …
[View More]companies pay the cities/counties to lay the fiber?
Is it mostly run on phone poles or in the ground?
Is it a recurring monthly fee or all up front?
Can anyone lay down fiber?
When someone is laying down fiber, do those companies have to provide an
opportunity for other companies to lay down fiber at the same time
(apparently some cities require this in order to prevent the same street
from being repeatedly dug up)?
Why exactly did Google Fiber give up on the bay area?
Was it too expensive for them to lay down fiber? If so, why is Comcast
special? (they are currently laying down massive fiber in Oakland and
starting to offer 2 GB to the home)
Which internet exchanges exist here and where are they located?
Are the exchanges for-profit companies?
What are the requirements to have a presence at an exchange?
Do the exchanges charge per rack-mounted unit?
Do they charge per peered connection?
How do small ISPs get peering agreements with Level 1 ISPs?
What do those agreements look like?
How do the agreements between AT&T and Comcast resellers work?
Where do wireless ISPs like Unwired get their bandwidth?
How do they physically bring it to their towers?
Where are the major data centers?
Where do data centers get their bandwidth?
How physically separate is Internet2?
Would it make sense for us to get on Internet2?
How would we go about that?
--
marc/juul
[View Less]
We may have an opportunity to get affordable gigabits from LMI.
They may allows us to put an AirFiber node on their roof. I haven't gotten
the quote yet but I'm expecting it to be around $1000 per month +/- 50%.
We'd need somewhere with line of sight to the LMI rooftop where we can
mount a few rooftop node.
Does anyone on this list live near this address or know someone who does?
One obvious peer would be one of the Berkeley Student Coops, e.g. Cloyne.
Can someone use e.g. Google Earth to …
[View More]check line of sight from the LMI roof
to the surrounding student coops?
The LMI address is:
1700 Martin Luther King Jr Way
Berkeley, CA 94709
--
marc/juul
[View Less]
a business i'm associated with which owns its own building at 64th and San
Pablo is presently hating Comcast and needs a new internet provider.
this business is community-oriented and is open to proposals from sudomesh to
do something like subscribe to high-power internet and allow PON to put a tower
on the roof and beam signals to other places.
the address is 6323 San Pablo avenue and it's a warehouse-style building with a
peak about 25 feet off the ground.
first step would be to suggest a …
[View More]vendor of high-powered internet and then
sudomesh would volunteer people to help get it plugged in inside the building,
and setup a simple private network for the business (the equivalent of a plain
wireless router)
i work there so i can help setup stuff.
-jake
[View Less]
The treasurer of my ISOC chapter said it took a loooong time to get
(Federal) 501c3 status for the chapter.
Overall it seems better to use the one that's already in place.
Of course I don't know what/how bad these headaches are:
"inherited bureaucratic headaches from ooc (old-omni entity)"
> I second jorrit on using the old entity, as long as it our lawyer gives us
> the OK. It seems like the easier option. And our bylaws need a rewrite
> anyway, maybe this would be a good reason …
[View More]to give them a once over?
> -grant
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jorrit Poelen <jhpoelen(a)xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> > I'd be for recycling the old entity if the paperwork is not too crazy
and
> > that the mission is tailored to what sudomesh does.
> > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:34 -0700, Jenny Ryan wrote:
> > Should we:
> > 1) take over omni's old 501c3? -or-
> > 2) submit our own application for 501c3 status?
> >
> > *1) - take over omni's old 501c3?*
> > (a) It doesn't have a purpose at the moment, and we worked hella hard on
> > procuring it. was a long-form application, so has already been
rigorously
> > reviewed by the irs.
<snip>
[View Less]
Hi all,
At the board meeting on Tuesday, we consented on acquiring 501c3 status by
the end of 2017.
Should we:
1) take over omni's old 501c3? -or-
2) submit our own application for 501c3 status?
*1) - take over omni's old 501c3?*
(a) It doesn't have a purpose at the moment, and we worked hella hard on
procuring it. was a long-form application, so has already been rigorously
reviewed by the irs.
(b) can submit amendments to our Articles of Incorporation changing the
name, primary activities + …
[View More]board of directors (this is what we did for the
ooc -> oc switch)
c) maybe best to wait & hear back from the IRS first (jenny submitted 2014
& 2015 taxes about a week ago) as well as omni's lawyer (jesse palmer)
d) has no assets, but does have 3 years of accounting & credit history. is
up to date on all required gov filings.
*2) - submit our own application for 501c3 status?*
(a) probably best to do a short-form (1023-EZ) application (less overhead &
faster turnaround) - tho that assumes we are not budgeting for more then
$50K annual gross income. contact jenny to get shared on current iteration
of app.
(b) no inherited bureaucratic headaches from ooc (old-omni entity)
(c) more iffy - the IRS only really scrutinizes you when you initially
apply; but they hardly blink on eye wrt amendments to articles, bylaws,
board, etc;
Thoughts appreciated, hopefully we can make a decision on this by Mayday :)
--
<3
Jenny
Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!
https://omnicommons.org/donate
`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson
"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
-Hannah Arendt
"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
[View Less]
i think it's perfect with the numbers, and I DON'T think it should be
obfuscated with dictionary words or emojis or something.
in fact i think the entire router IP address should be in there!
people need to learn more about networking, it's not that hard, and this is a
perfect opportunity for that. it's really important that people start to see
IP addresses, especially if we want people to put up web services on the mesh
itself! it's really exciting.
peoplesopen.net 10.64.2.1
peoplesopen.…
[View More]net 5GHz 10.64.2.1
-jake
PS i was an early whiner about the same-SSID roaming problems :)
> We finally have unique SSIDs for the nodes.
>
> Instead of them all being named "peoplesopen.net" they will now have the
> last three parts of the IPv4 address added to the name. E.g. for a home
> node with the IP 100.64.2.1 the SSIDs will be:
>
> 2.4 Ghz: "peoplesopen.net 64.2.1"
> 5 GHZ: "peoplesopen.net fast 64.2.1"
>
> An extender node with the IP 100.64.2.2 will have the SSID "peoplesopen.net
> 64.2.2" even if it is a 5 GHz node. Extender nodes always only have one
> radio, so this is fine.
>
> This only applies to home nodes configured after this change and extender
> nodes flashed with the latest (not yet downloadable) build.
>
> I moved builds.sudomesh.org to be hosted on the VPS running the
> peoplesopen.net website and will grant Grant access as soon as I have his
> SSH key so he can upload the latest builds.
>
> We should later upgrade this to map the scary numbers to either nice simple
> english language words (or why limit to english? give an option of spanish)
> or emojis.
>
> For those of you who are not read up on this issue, the nodes need to have
> unique SSIDs because they we do not have layer 3 roaming working, so when a
> client device is connected to a node's "peoplesopen.net" wifi network and
> auto-roams to a different node's wifi network also called "peoplesopen.net"
> then it will suddenly be on a new subnet but it will not ask for a new DHCP
> lease, since clients assume that multiple access points with the same name
> are on the same layer 2 networs / subnet. The result is that people who are
> sitting approximately between two mesh nodes will have their internet
> intermittently stop working for minutes at a time.
>
> --
> marc/juul
[View Less]
I was working on some changes to the babeld-lab repo. I ended up not using
any of the existing code, but learning from the concepts, so I put the new
code in its own repo: https://github.com/sudomesh/network-lab
It reads a JSON network graph format defining nodes and edges and uses it
to create nodes in network namespaces linked by virtual ethernet edges of
differing quality (babeld-lab connects all nodes to one switch).
Each edge has configurable latency and packet loss in both directions
…
[View More]provided by tc netem.
Each node can run arbitrary scripts in its namespace on startup. These
scripts could be used to start a routing protocol.
-Jehan
[View Less]
Hey everybody!
Exciting news, the new firmware has been pushed to the builds server!
You can now go ahead, flash your router, and let us know what you think of
the new dashboard. After flashing, you will have redo makenode, unless
someone has a method for upgrading the firmware without resetting the
router, (this could be a cool feature to add to the dashboard).
I recommend following the walkthrough if its been awhile since you last
flashed. I am working on making more updates to that guide, …
[View More]but everything
in it is still applicable (except the one screenshot of the old web-ui).
Walkthrough: https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Mesh/WalkThrough
Direct download:
https://builds.sudomesh.org/builds/chaos_calmer/ar71xx/openwrt-ar71xx-gener…
One other thing, does anyone know why the builds server is throwing 403
error when trying to list the builds at
https://builds.sudomesh.org/builds/chaos_calmer/ar71xx/ but is still
letting me download the new firmware and go to https://builds.sudomesh.org/?
Were the permissions changed on the builds directory?
Thanks!
-grant
[View Less]
We finally have unique SSIDs for the nodes.
Instead of them all being named "peoplesopen.net" they will now have the
last three parts of the IPv4 address added to the name. E.g. for a home
node with the IP 100.64.2.1 the SSIDs will be:
2.4 Ghz: "peoplesopen.net 64.2.1"
5 GHZ: "peoplesopen.net fast 64.2.1"
An extender node with the IP 100.64.2.2 will have the SSID "peoplesopen.net
64.2.2" even if it is a 5 GHz node. Extender nodes always only have one
radio, so this is fine.
This only …
[View More]applies to home nodes configured after this change and extender
nodes flashed with the latest (not yet downloadable) build.
I moved builds.sudomesh.org to be hosted on the VPS running the
peoplesopen.net website and will grant Grant access as soon as I have his
SSH key so he can upload the latest builds.
We should later upgrade this to map the scary numbers to either nice simple
english language words (or why limit to english? give an option of spanish)
or emojis.
For those of you who are not read up on this issue, the nodes need to have
unique SSIDs because they we do not have layer 3 roaming working, so when a
client device is connected to a node's "peoplesopen.net" wifi network and
auto-roams to a different node's wifi network also called "peoplesopen.net"
then it will suddenly be on a new subnet but it will not ask for a new DHCP
lease, since clients assume that multiple access points with the same name
are on the same layer 2 networs / subnet. The result is that people who are
sitting approximately between two mesh nodes will have their internet
intermittently stop working for minutes at a time.
--
marc/juul
[View Less]
i keep getting kicked off my home node randomly when my DHCP lease "expires"
my computer then rejoins the network and gets back the same IP address but this
shouldn't be happening. Can we call it a bug?
here is my system log from a typical event, it happens all the time:
https://pastebin.com/L4c2MuGa
-jake
I think the question is whether udp broadcast is supported by the mesh firmware or by openwrt by default so that users of patchwork can identify and address one another on the people's open net.
----- Reply message -----
From: "Marc Juul" <juul(a)labitat.dk>
To: "Lesley Bell" <lbx2045(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org" <mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org>
Subject: [Mesh] How would patchwork work with mesh?
Date: Mon, Apr 10, 2017 5:26 AM
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 8:04 PM, …
[View More]Lesley Bell <lbx2045(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many of you are familiar with *patchwork
> <https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork>,* Dominic Tarr's distributed
> messaging app. We have been talking about different apps that could run
> directly over the mesh, and I believe patchwork can do so as it is now--if
> you are on the same local network as another user, you can talk to them
> even if you are not connected to an external ISP, and you can see who is on
> the same network as you are.
>
> I have asked a few people, and can't get a certain answer to the question
> of, can messages be passed with patchwork over the whole mesh, or only
> those connected to a particular node? Patchwork uses encrypted message
> passing over TCP/IP, so I think it should work that way...can anyone on
> here confirm/deny/elaborate?
>
I'm not sure I understand the question. The mesh is just like the internet
except we don't have world-routable IPs. Every node is behind NAT (until we
get an IPv6 allocation). Are you talking about SSB nodes or mesh nodes? Are
you asking a question about the mesh or about how SSB operates? or about
how SSB operates on the mesh and how that's different from how it operates
on the normal internet?
--
marc/juul
[View Less]
Hi all,
Many of you are familiar with *patchwork
<https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork>,* Dominic Tarr's distributed messaging
app. We have been talking about different apps that could run directly over
the mesh, and I believe patchwork can do so as it is now--if you are on the
same local network as another user, you can talk to them even if you are
not connected to an external ISP, and you can see who is on the same
network as you are.
I have asked a few people, and can't get a certain …
[View More]answer to the question
of, can messages be passed with patchwork over the whole mesh, or only
those connected to a particular node? Patchwork uses encrypted message
passing over TCP/IP, so I think it should work that way...can anyone on
here confirm/deny/elaborate?
Thanks,
L
[View Less]
Hey guys my friend that I hooked up with a node at 42nd street is an expert
in online advertising and runs a pro-bono side-gig providing free
advertising services to non-profits
He says we can get $10,000 a month in free adwords advertising from google.
Here's their website: http://www.adzee.org/
We could target the ads to just zip code around the omni (94609).
We could develop messages and landing pages to accomplish different goals:
- Get more people to come to our "build your own internet" …
[View More]workshops
- Get more people to host mesh nodes
- Encourage people to donate money
- Encourage people to join the project as a volunteer
It could help build awareness of our project and get more people on the
network.
Should we do this?
[View Less]
Here they are! Also @ https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Mesh/4_April_2017 <https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Mesh/4_April_2017>
People's Open Network
4 April 2017to
= intros =
andrew, juul, jorrit, ian?
josh: never played with mesh networks but curious
eve, daniel, jeff, lesley
= updates =
Mike, carpenter friend of Daniel, confirmed today that will be helping build the gate at the server area.
== NSF Grant (competition?) ==+
* Panel in Oakland: POSTPONED until unknown date in the summer.
* juul …
[View More]let them know we're willing to help out in various ways
* https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/03/07/2-million-prize-building-accessibl… <https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/03/07/2-million-prize-building-accessibl…>
== RESIST grant: Jenny ==
Due this Friday
== Dashboard/firmware update ==
jehan: The dashboard has reached a good stopping point, and grant knows how to deploy it. I'll be back at sudo this Sunday to do a final QA on it to make sure it is ok. cool, am looking into where/when to insert the new repo in the firmware build, makefiles based off wlan slovenia
== battlemesh ==
Jehan: I want to look into bringing some of our many n600's to battle mesh and helping them set up their testbed. Also, what about taking another stab at getting some good confirmed connectivity at some of the houses around the omni?
== NPR interview update? ==
He's still working on it. Monday he requested I connect him to Mitar, which I did.
== New installation updates? ==
Jake took a long pre-crimped ethernet cable from the shelf and will fix his new node (had loose connection).
== Disaster Radio update ==
Started working on an ESP8266-based version using NodeMCU here: https://github.com/sudomesh/disaster-radio-nodemcu <https://github.com/sudomesh/disaster-radio-nodemcu>
grant interested in helping out, building modules?
We have a working system and development framework that so far does: wifi, dhcp server, dns server and webserver serving up a node.js app
juul will be adding a new access point to the people's open net home node firmware
== Monitoring / map software update ==
* No code progress since last week.
* Had discussion on Sunday about node mapping:
: For now we should simply have a "register your node" feature on the map where you can add your email, phone and node location (all optional)
: In the future we might want better
* Need to deploy to server.
* Andrew interested in working on it?
== inventory security: gate project update ==
daniel has a carpenter friend he's gonna ask to help out
== Annual meeting: April 18, 7:30 ==
juul will ask if jenny wants to send invite
Need to send email
== Discussion of working groups / nominations of facilitators ==
lesley: everyone is contributing to multiple things overlapping with the proposed subgroups, why do we need this?
jorrit says he is talking a lot... is interested in taking lead for on-boarding possible contributors
eve: what's the branding of people's open
lesley: decentralized, without leaders, without surviellance, be clearer on messaging
grant: scalable collectivisation
create node mounting group, jeff volunteered his house for a node mounting demo, Sunday 1pm, BRING YO BIKE HELMETS
we don't have a tall ladder, or van?
daniel: we should make sure we do our installations right. so they look nice.
[View Less]